I cannot understand anyone's objection to kicking the tires on RGIII.
This goes a long way towards summing up mine:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...nt-assess-the-rest-of-the-Commanders-offense/
No one will sign him without a physical and a workout/interview.
No one in Dallas will be involved in a bidding war for a QB who didn't play last year.
I have to wonder what the Rams' thinking would be. They're obviously looking for a quarterback, they're moving back to LA, and Jeff Fisher has had similar-skilled quarterbacks in the past. They might Griffin an offer that gives him a great chance to start?
If signed, he's signed as a possible upgrade at backup to Moore. He then provides at least a slim chance of getting his game back together behind a better OL with a star receiver.
And if he doesn't, we're essentially no better off than we were in 2015.
That move doesn't stop us from drafting a QB at 4 if our guy is there, but that's far from a sure thing. If no QB we want is there at 4, a veteran backup allows us to take a developmental QB in another round or waiting for next year, depending on how the draft unfolds. It also doesn't prevent us from cutting RGIII loose if he stinks in camp to go with another backup.
At that point, you're picking over the scraps that nobody else wanted. Much like 2015.
Unlike Johnny Football, who is clearly off his rails right now, bringing RGIII in on a prove-it, incentive laden contract to compete is a no-brainer. If he's offered something better elsewhere, so be it.
Given his track record and the reports on his football acumen, I think there's plenty of risk involved and a decision on him is far from a "no-brainer".
I think that if you wanted to bring either Griffin or Manziel in, the best thing to do would be to carry four quarterbacks as insurance, having a better veteran backup, in addition to a rookie. That's the only way you safeguard yourself against either of these two guys washing out or proving incapable.