zeke21
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,594
- Reaction score
- 2,662
For context, its the same argument we had two years ago. Be clear that Rush is not a starting caliber QB, he is a barely serviceable back up if we are being truthful.
What he has shown, and is showing, is that the level of output between him and Dak is similar - not enough against good teams but can beat up on a weak division. Dak is making 60M a year because he gets to rack up numbers against the Giants and Washington each year.. and any other soft targets we get. Hence why we do well against a weak schedule and then make playoffs and then struggle the next year.
I don't like any suggestion that we move forward with Rush.. but it shows just how much of a fraud Dak is. And it should have been enough when he won those games two years ago to show ANY half decent GM that Dak was nothing special. I still can't quite believe that we signed a new contract for Dak.. it is just mind boggling.
What he has shown, and is showing, is that the level of output between him and Dak is similar - not enough against good teams but can beat up on a weak division. Dak is making 60M a year because he gets to rack up numbers against the Giants and Washington each year.. and any other soft targets we get. Hence why we do well against a weak schedule and then make playoffs and then struggle the next year.
I don't like any suggestion that we move forward with Rush.. but it shows just how much of a fraud Dak is. And it should have been enough when he won those games two years ago to show ANY half decent GM that Dak was nothing special. I still can't quite believe that we signed a new contract for Dak.. it is just mind boggling.