If previous fines plus a shove equals suspension, what's stopping teams from seeking to penalize shoving with a fine? Afterwards, if a player has been fined on several occasions for shoving, he will be automatically suspended.
That seems to be the logical progression here, even though I disagree. If players accumulate fines for in-game transgression which could or did impact the healthy well-being of another player, a suspension would be necessary in my opinion.
Let's review Adams' 2009 fine timeline:
1) Against Tampa Bay, he was fined for unnecessary roughness for taking a swing a player's head.
2) Against New York, he was fined for both tripping Tuck and kicking Umenyiora.
3) Against Carolina, he was fined for
kicking at Julius Peppers.
A punch could have led to a head injury. Tripping and kicking could have led to a bodily injury. Any of these three incidents could have impacted the health of another player.
Should a suspension be enforced for the above? It's debatable, but understandable. Teams want healthy players and Adams
could have theoretically injured all three of them (As far as I know, Tuck was the only player to have sustained an actual injury).
He wasn't though. Presently, a supposed suspension looms over Adams for NOT potentially inflicting another theoretical injury along with the previous three instances. Disciplinary action may come as a result of one act of
tripping (FOUL!), two acts of
kicking (DOUBLE FOUL!)and a
shove (OH LOOK! HE FELL DOWN!).

Whatever. Do what you have to, Goodell. You will still have my support, but I hope you will comprehend what the consequences of a possible suspension could eventually lead to. If I were an opposing coach, I would seek to have the other team's player(s) repeatedly disciplined for shoving. As a result, they would potentially accumulate enough fines for a suspension review and PRESTO! That guy's riding the bench.
You think that's outlandish? I would then ask you to pay close attention to what will or will not happen to Adams this week.