- Messages
- 79,212
- Reaction score
- 45,387
Yeah, IIRC Zim didn't have a sexy defense (turnovers, sacks), but it was efficient....until it wasn't. Can blame that on Zimmer, talent, or both.Just my opinion, but I am not sure the GB goes down the same with Zimmer as with Quinn (EDIT: Not saying we win, but rather not sure we look as inept as we did against GBs offense). But the flipside is I don't think you'll see as many dominant games (turnovers, sacks, etc) under Zimmer that we saw under Quinn. I suspect Zimmer's defenses will be fairly boring in relation to Quinn's defenses that would look like the 85 Bears for a few weeks and then drop a few monumental turd balls.
I know I don't expect it to be as fun to watch as Quinn's.