Maybe if you think about it for sometime perhaps you will figure it out...... Most likely you won't because you have overrated BeasleyYeah, how? Or is this an empty comment hoping nobody notices the lack of content and or duped into thinking you have made a point?
Explain how it proves your point that Beasley should get cut to show that you are using a double standard for Beasley that you don't apply to Austin, Thompson and Brown, or how it proves your point to show that Beasley has a better track record and is no older than players you are claiming to be better?
Im betting he almost never get used from the backfield..he will be a WR running a lot of end arounds, sweeps, bubble screens, and the like..hes always ben a wr and he still is regardless what they list him as..google him hes listed as an NFL WR..
Maybe if you think about it for sometime perhaps you will figure it out...... Most likely you won't because you have overrated Beasley
Bo is a beast in the weight room and often worked out with the OLBo 6-1, 228, 4.52, 14 reps bench
DJ 6ź0, 220, 4.4, 20 reps bench
Welcome back.....but I don't think he will make the 53.
You're adding things I never said into your "argument". I responded to "no way Beasley gets cut" by giving reasons why he could get cut. Somehow you made up all kinds of things I never said. You proved my point about all these receivers that none are just way much better. Hurns is the best receiver on the team right now. Gallup isn't going anywhere and why you tried to say him and Wilson don't have 1000 yards either is silly as both are rookies...... They're both more talented then Beasley and have way much more potential as well. Let's be honest Austin and Thompson aren't here for the long run but they bring speed, a trait Beasley also doesnt have.lol - the old "well if you don't know I'm not going to tell you" tactic. Haven't seen that in years! It was a hoot back in 5th grade! It appears you are experienced in the art of typing words that say absolutely nothing.
As for your claim I am overrating Beasley - I've only stated facts that prove your arguments are baseless. It is fact - not my personal rating of Beasley - that Thompson is older than Beasley, and Austin is only a year younger, thus your argument that Beasley's age makes him the one that should be cut is, in fact, baseless. And it also is fact - not my personal rating of Beasley - that Beasley has put up better numbers as a receiver than either Austin or Thompson, thus your argument that his production makes him the one that should be cut is also, in fact, baseless. It's actually pretty humorous that you disparage Beasley for not having a 1000 yard season when the guys you advocate keeping over him have only reached a 500 yard season once. But why not choose whatever nonsensical double standard you want, right?
But, hey, when your actual attempts at making an argument fail, it's always good to have the common bailout tactic of the mindless poster at your disposal, right? Just claim you have made a point without actually saying what that point is, and pretend nobody notices. I hate to be the one to tell you, but you it's really not as effective as you think it is.
I'm glad Jackson is back. Maybe they looked at Austin as a RB at first but recent comments suggest he will be a receiver. Perhaps Bo and Jackson buy make it.
I like it. Gives us tons of speed on offense by adding Austin, Jackson and Thompson