I'm glad we got him. We have to pay Sanchez for the whole year if he's on the roster for the game next week, so this could be bad news for Moore.
Not sure what that has to do with anything.He has experience in our division.
To those against this move, are you kidding? We could do way worse for a backup.
What exactly? And what would you have them do?you are doing that anyway. Again, the Cowboys based the season on Romos health, again a bad move. Sanchez is not going to fix the problem that they keep ignoring.
you are doing that anyway. Again, the Cowboys based the season on Romos health, again a bad move. Sanchez is not going to fix the problem that they keep ignoring.
It is the actual player. You are arguing for a concept.To those against this move, are you kidding? We could do way worse for a backup.
has Showers been cut? also does Gregory count for a roster spot?
It is the actual player. You are arguing for a concept.
Sanchez is a turover waiting to happen each and every time his hands surround the football. That is an established fact.
Call me crazy but that does not exactly spell "great move".
It is the actual player. You are arguing for a concept.
Sanchez is a turover waiting to happen each and every time his hands surround the football. That is an established fact.
Call me crazy but that does not exactly spell "great move".
You have not, but several others have.I didn't say it was a "great" move. But I'm not sure who is preferable and available. He has a ton of starting experience and has done well in a run-first offense.