HabsCowboysOwn
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 884
- Reaction score
- 2,643
This should be a no-brainer but of course the rocket scientists in charge know better and would rather sign a nobody off the street.
Thats what I'm thinking too. I do not really see the downside to bringing him on board.He would pair up very well with Pollard and is a true pounder. No real gamble here.
As I said before, yes, I realize that. I shouldn't have said start though, you're correct, simply that with his pedigree he should have had more success and a higher load, especially given the QB situation there.You realize Breece Hall is really good. No one expected Dalvin Cook to beat him out.
I think this is where facts sit at present:The team likely “visits” on every vet player released in season. Like Stephen says, they always talk about the available players.
This is just fish being fish and fishing for clicks.
Hey man, don't be hating. They went out and got SaRodorick Thompson!!This should be a no-brainer but of course the rocket scientists in charge know better and would rather sign a nobody off the street.
The worst thing to do would be for McCarthy to keep dialing up early runs, especially if the first few get stuffed. Should Pollard or another back start finding early down success in the opening stages, that would of course change things. But if a couple of first-down carries get stuffed in the first quarter, then either McCarthy has to put the ball in Prescott’s hands, or the quarterback himself has to audible to passes.I think this is where facts sit at present:
McCarthy has done some good things, and if his team wins on Sunday as expected, he will have coached them to three consecutive 12-win seasons. That is praiseworthy, but he also has some significant flaws. His game and clock management at the ends of halves is at times maddening, and his stubbornness is another serious irritant. Establishing the run is a concept that has been convincingly discredited by better football minds than mine, yet McCarthy still clings to it. With Prescott, Lamb, and company, he needs to adjust his thinking to better reflect the modern realities of the game. Instead of trying to have balance on first downs, he needs to focus instead on what is the most likely play to find success. That is throwing the ball. Prescott completes passes at a 68.4% rate, which is what they need to lean on. A lot of the completions on first down would set up second and short, and that is when the run might be more efficient. They even have a nice insurance policy should a first down pass fall incomplete, as Prescott’s completion percentage on third down is 68.8%, making it still very likely they will get another set of downs even if they don’t get anything with a first down throw.
https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/202...ak-prescott-ceedee-lamb-mike-mccarthy-pollard
While it is likely to be harder to do so, Dallas also plays its best when it gets a lead. That also sets up a time when the run can be more useful as it can also burn clock, an idea that McCarthy seemed to have forgotten on the last scoring possession last Saturday. Getting ahead will almost always come via the air. If they do, then once again the run can become more important.
It they don’t have a lead, they have no real choice but to be pass heavy. It is clearly the way to get points.
I agree. The Eagles will sign him.So this clearly means no!!!! He's going to go to a tour, we will have interest, but will lose him to the eagles lol
Sounds par for the course, hope it ends up differently but it looks like all smoke and no fire from what we have seen in the pastSo this clearly means no!!!! He's going to go to a tour, we will have interest, but will lose him to the eagles lol
I thought I recalled him being a hard runner with a nose for the end zone, or at least better than who we've got and ,,, but I don't see him wanting to come to Dallas where the running blocking is abysmal anyway.If our problem in the run game is poor blocking, I don't see how he helps.