LOL, just going down the list I see.
Wouldn't make it out of camp. "We like our guys"
Oh my gosh. YOU'RE RIGHT!!Could you imagine if we sign Iloka and trade for Quinn? Who could beat us?
If you think those stats prove your point then you are sadly mistaken.And Boston has more picks than Heath, thanks for proving my point
I agree. I think Richard will get his guy. Earl contract was insane. We tried trading for him and we brought in berry too. I think Richard will get his guy this offseasonEveryone badmouting Iloka stop and repeat after me:
KRIS RICHARD KNOWS MORE ABOUT DBs THAN ANYONE ON EARTH
Keep repeating it until Iloka signs.
That was my quickly deduced surmising upon given it brief consideration.Iloka is not even an upgrade. Why bother.
John Owning has an article out. Iloka was asked to play cover 2 and 4 in the Bengals/Vikings scheme. Is a better fit in Cowboys cover 1 and 3 schemes.
Boston is way over-rated by fans.
Won’t sign him either..
Thats a few games difference.If you think those stats prove your point then you are sadly mistaken.
Boston played more snaps.
Even if they had played the same number of snaps, if Heath is a terrible player and has 8 then Boston is barely better with 11.
If a RB with 11 fumbles per season needed to be replaced nobody would consider a RB with 8 fumbles per season as solving that team's fumble problems.
*This is a prime example of sound wisdom , in as any detailed display of using sound logical reasoning in expressing one's insightful footballish views ,,,er,,,that I can recently recall being impressed by,,,If you think those stats prove your point then you are sadly mistaken.
Boston played more snaps.
Even if they had played the same number of snaps, if Heath is a terrible player and has 8 then Boston is barely better with 11.
If a RB with 11 fumbles per season needed to be replaced nobody would consider a RB with 8 fumbles per season as solving that team's fumble problems.
Thats a few games difference.
Last 3 seasons
Boston 10 Picks
Heath 5 Picks
Yep no difference there