***Cowboyszone Mock Draft Discussion Thread***

Qwickdraw said:
Cbz and Avery should veto this trade.
It was stated in the rules that unrealistic trades would not be honored.
I think this trade is garbage, personally.
I would fire my GM if he traded 3 picks for one like that. Especially in the middle of a round like this years first!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Qwickdraw said:
Cbz and Avery should veto this trade.
It was stated in the rules that unrealistic trades would not be honored.
I think this trade is garbage, personally.
why is it unrealistic? The steelers pick very late in both rounds, and a 3rd next year equals a 4th next year. When you add the fact that Pitt doesn't have a lot of needs and just needs a player or two to get over the top and itmakes sense.
 
Qwickdraw said:
Cbz and Avery should veto this trade.
It was stated in the rules that unrealistic trades would not be honored.
I think this trade is garbage, personally.


How can you say a trade is unrealistic after the Saints traded every pick for Rickey Williams? or the Giants trading the picks they did last year for Manning? I don't think any trade is unrealistic what about the Walker trade to the Vikes?
 
jksmith269 said:
How can you say a trade is unrealistic after the Saints traded every pick for Rickey Williams? or the Giants trading the picks they did last year for Manning? I don't think any trade is unrealistic what about the Walker trade to the Vikes?


Williams was a Blue Chip Pick that they felt they had to have AT THE TOP of the picki8ng. Same with Eli, they felt he was the second comming. To trade all this for a mid 1st pick, pacman at that, is arse
 
Because Roughneck does not have to reap the consequences of trading 3 picks next year.
Thats why.
Lets just say, its foolish.
 
jksmith269 said:
How can you say a trade is unrealistic after the Saints traded every pick for Rickey Williams? or the Giants trading the picks they did last year for Manning? I don't think any trade is unrealistic what about the Walker trade to the Vikes?
Yeah and they all go down as the dumbest trades in draft history except the Manning Trade. Which shouldn't even be compared to what we are talking about anyway!
 
If they veto this trade we'll be here next week, it's for fun God's sake. That being said I'm thinking about taking all 3 hours to see if I can get all of the draft picks from 1 team in the 06 draft. ;-)
 
Tio said:
why is it unrealistic? The steelers pick very late in both rounds, and a 3rd next year equals a 4th next year. When you add the fact that Pitt doesn't have a lot of needs and just needs a player or two to get over the top and itmakes sense.
Correct.

We desperately needed a Cornerback and absolutely loved Adam "Pac-man" Jones. Exactly the type of deal I was looking for.
 
Tio said:
why is it unrealistic? The steelers pick very late in both rounds, and a 3rd next year equals a 4th next year. When you add the fact that Pitt doesn't have a lot of needs and just needs a player or two to get over the top and itmakes sense.
It was a good trade for both teams. Wanna take a guess at who he wants. I think it's obvious. Oh, and according to the draft chart, this WAS a fair trade.
 
They swaped firsts, and roughneck gave a second this year and a 3 next year.
whats so unrealistic
 
Qwickdraw said:
Because Roughneck does not have to reap the consequences of trading 3 picks next year.
Thats why.
Lets just say, its foolish.
It's not 3 picks next year. It's my First (#30) and Second (#62) this year with my 3rd Rounder from next year.
 
Qwickdraw said:
Because Roughneck does not have to reap the consequences of trading 3 picks next year.
Thats why.
Lets just say, its foolish.
they were not all for next year. He traded up 16 spots in the first for a late second and what equals to a very late 4th.
 
ok he picked

NEXT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Roughneck said:
Correct.

We desperately needed a Cornerback and absolutely loved Adam "Pac-man" Jones. Exactly the type of deal I was looking for.
Excellent pick. I think you are a wise GM. ;)
 
The whole 06 trade pick stuff was disturbing to me. Just wreaks of problems.
 
Tio said:
they were not all for next year. He traded up 16 spots in the first for a late second and what equals to a very late 4th.
the way it was originally worded was a "1st, 2nd and 3rd from next year".
sounded like they were all for next year.
either way, taking 2+ hours to pick when you are actually online is ridiculous.

lets move on...
its a done deal...
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,272
Messages
13,801,971
Members
23,776
Latest member
saturdaysarebetter
Back
Top