No, he didn't earn it. See his performance last week. See the Cowboys not make the playoffs? He contributed to that. He played his butt off most games, but he had some bad ones this year too and contributed to the losses. So no, he didn't earn the opportunity. It's interesting that you only bring up Romo in any positive way when it makes Dak look good.
Dak improved some this year but regressed a bit in the second half of the season. Hopefully he will improve more and then any records will come as they come. No need to have to provide opportunities.
Oooh, but Romo was outright allowed to go super pass heavy for years without question, even when he had a decent rushing attack to lean on? You know like that single season franchise passing record year of 2012 where the team rushed 355 times for 1,265 yards but passed 658 times for Romo's franchise season passing record of 4,903 yards which resulted in an 8 - 8 year in which Romo got praised?
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/dal/2012.htm
Yet, this 2019 8 - 8 season, Dak gets blasted for passing 596 times for 4,902 yards while the team ran the ball 449 times for a total of 2,153 yards. A much more balanced attack. It's very obvious today's team was way more balanced than that 2012 team, yet Dak gets blasted for supposedly being a greedy pass heavy QB, while Romo got praised in 2012 for actually passing a lot more than the team rushed the football?
http://www.nfl.com/teams/dallascowboys/statistics?team=DAL
This is the slanted bias that I'm talking about and why I bring up Romo. It's intentional, unwarranted, falsely accusatory and hypocritical.