Smart people can make foolish comments and arrive at foolish conclusions when stating the obvious....
Obviously Dak is not Brady, nor is Garrett Belichick. Nor is the Patriot offense the Cowboys offense.
Smart people all come to that conclusion, I hope. There is such a thing as good, better and best. In this case Brady = best and on a scale of all 32 quarterbacks, I personally would rate Dak as better. Same for Belichick vs Garrett. More often than not, best beats better 9 out of 10 times.
Having said that, I feel Brady does have pocket presence but when watching him I think is scheme (Belichick's strategy) benefits him more than the scheme (Garrett's) that Dak operates in. Garrett's offensive scheme is based on timing and athletic prowess whereas Belichicks offensive scheme is more based upon strategically designed plays that get the ball out of Brady's hands extremely fast which requires less pocket presence by Brady. The routes the Patriots run from what I see are primarily quick, short and sometimes even illegal with picks that go uncalled a great deal of the time. Due to the play designs, db's are often at a disadvantage as the Pats master this system, that's why their players in my observation are so interchangeable.
Why no one else does this on a routine basis like the Pats, baffles me. They just master a system and not depend on athletic prowess or talent because all of these guys are athletic marvels. That's why it upsets me to the fullest to hear smart people say stupid things and bash athletes on their skills or on their performance....These guys are gods...(not God) but gods that have skills that most of us who critique them mercilessly can only dream of having. In high school football and even in college, talent more often than not wins more than systems in most cases...But at the NFL level, a great system with a a great mastermind like Belichick, over time will be proven to be more successful than great talent. I could go on but I digress...
You be you and I'll be me...