Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,482
- Reaction score
- 67,294
Oh give me a break. That's excuse making for a QB that simply isn't good enough. All of a sudden when the real talent isn't on the field as the make up to his acne, the coaches are forcing Prescott to play poorly.
Not saying it is a "good enough" excuse.
But it is very clear to me at least that this staff is not effective at getting the best of out of its QBs and it does have a restrictive element to it if conditions are not optimal. You can't just have three very different QBs experience the same sort of mediocrity and not establish some sort of connection. It is apparent from the loss of Romo that he covered up a lot of warts and probably provided more tweaks to this scheme than any of us imagined.
Prescott is operating under the same system run by the same people minus the talent and attention draw of Elliott. This is not a system like others in the league that can just plug in a QB and execute. Aside from some read option variance, it is not that much different than what we ran with Romo. Prescott is not cut out for it, he does not have the arm talent and especially the diagnostic skill to make it run at a high level.
If Prescott is going to fulfill the expectations set last year, he is going to require a staff that has an ability to evolve the scheme. Garrett and Co. do not strike me as especially imaginative or flexible.