You act like the loons that pick talent and spend for this team. 25 years later, you are concerned about remedial math. Teams that spend money and win SBs can justify their spending, I.e your Rams example. Teams that can’t justify spending because they are unsuccessful, I.e. Cowboys, have advanced mathematicians, like you, to explain away the failure. You’re obsessed with explaining cap space. I’m concerned about the lack of success of the Cowboys due to wasteful and ineffective spending…. The POINT of my post. $40 million to an average QB, with similar spending on ineffective talent, equals failure. You might need more than a 5th grade math book to help you see my point.
OMG, I have never seen anyone as confused as you on this board. you are all over the place and haven't followed one line of logic.
I quote, you said
"40 million with 200 available to an average player. That sums up our chances here."
which I proceeded to correct you. there is no denying what you said is totally wrong from every angle. what I responded was absolutely correct, no denying that.
subsequently you asked for results. my answer was the the way you calculate the impact to the cap, vs. results are separate concepts. but that's way above your level of understanding.
now, you agree with me. that teams spend and manage cap and win superbowls. your frustration is not with the dollars handed out and cap management, its with talent evaluation and how the team is constructed. you tried to attack and vent, but used an absolute meaningless logic.
and 40M is not what's paid to Dak on the cap. its the talent evaluation part that sucks. and I am in total agreement with you on that. I don't mind handing out 40M. it can be easily managed on the cap. but the way this team is constructed is like a fantasy football team.
you are one very frustrated person. almost foaming at the mouth with anger. I get it. I am also mad at the management of the Cowboys as they have managed to screw everything up, royally.