Tell me you don't care if Dallas wins as long as Dak piles up useless stats.You are a Bash Dak Over Dallas Cult member. Tell me you wouldn't rather see Dallas lose so you can bash Dak. Tell me if you give credit to Dak when he wins.
And? In the end their playoff results have been the same. They both stink when the good teams come to town.Y'all are confusing Dak with Romo. Romo was the one who had issues in December. Not Dak.
So your saying Trey Lance was a good trade for us?At some point GMs will start to value speed of processing over things like arm strength and size. Guys like Reid, Shanahan, and Belichick seem to do better than most in this regard.
Is that before or after we played them?Combined records of the teams we have played.
39-64 - 38% winning percentage.
Yeah, Dak is playing well..
NFL dot com has no less than 12 QBs in 1st round mock they just put out. My guess is many of those will not live up to their draft position. Even those they say are NFL ready.I think colleges just aren't preparing QB's for the NFL like they use to for the most part, so we see a lot of 1st rounders hit a wall when they get in the NFL.
I think Hurts is playing well. I’d even say clutch. He's been on the winning side of like 10 or 12 straight games in a row vs opponents with winning records at the time. That’s pretty strong and I know he’s been a catalyst for those wins for many of those games (not all).Purdy is playing well.....I don't think Hurts is despite all of his rushing touchdowns. But at the same time....Dak hasn't lost 3 games in a row either and neither has Hurts. Purdy has.
yeah, sure thing.Presumptuous much?
As for giving Deek's credit when he wins, that I have.
Now quit before you embarrass yourself further.
I want Dallas to win. period. I support every player on Dallas team and on game day I root for all of them. I don't care about stats for any one player on the team.Tell me you don't care if Dallas wins as long as Dak piles up useless stats.
he is not and doesn't need to be. Dak is not elite. non-elite QBs are non-elite because they make mistakes and they can't necessarily put a team on their back. they need a team around them.Call me a Dak hater but in the end, I don't trust Dak to pull a rabbit out of his hat if that is ever required of him to win a big game. He's not our football savior.
if 12 are first round worthy, it speaks to the lack of quality in QBs coming out of college.NFL dot com has no less than 12 QBs in 1st round mock they just put out. My guess is many of those will not live up to their draft position. Even those they say are NFL ready.
give me a top 3 OL, top 5 WR group, top 3 DL, top 5 defense, great running game and a great coach like Siriani and we win many more games like that. ...but we have Steele at RT, and coaches who refuse to help him out when he is clearly struggling and failing.....there is a difference.I think Hurts is playing well. I’d even say clutch. He's been on the winning side of like 10 or 12 straight games in a row vs opponents with winning records at the time. That’s pretty strong and I know he’s been a catalyst for those wins for many of those games (not all).
100% not true, but you're free to think what you want. There's a big difference between wanting Dak to lose versus not believing he can get the job done when it matters most.now, you say it.....tell everyone if you rather see Dallas Lose with Dak so you can bash him, than see Dallas win with Dak. tell us how you don't give everybody else credit for wins, including the opposing team for sucking than give Dak any credit for anything........
Wins and loses matter for QB evaluation? I thought that was a team stat?Purdy is playing well.....I don't think Hurts is despite all of his rushing touchdowns. But at the same time....Dak hasn't lost 3 games in a row either and neither has Hurts. Purdy has.
No. That’s not it. This is evidence that we have a damn good QB. Pretty much everyone agrees we have a good team and having a good qb on the team means wins and the capability to win it all.Golf clap..........
He still can't beat better teams and sucks in the playoffs. But I get it, we love him because of his ability to stack up regular season stats.
5 in top 9 picks, Id agree with you, it's supposed to be a strong class but that Mock shows how desperate teams are for quality QB play.if 12 are first round worthy, it speaks to the lack of quality in QBs coming out of college.
give me a top 3 OL, top 5 WR group, top 3 DL, top 5 defense, great running game and a great coach like Siriani and we win many more games like that. ...but we have Steele at RT, and coaches who refuse to help him out when he is clearly struggling and failing.....there is a
I wish I could give them those things you cited. However, Philly doesn’t have them either. They don’t have a great running game. They don’t have a too 5 defense. Whether the coach is great or not is highly debatable. The Cowboys have a better offense, a better defense, and better special teams.give me a top 3 OL, top 5 WR group, top 3 DL, top 5 defense, great running game and a great coach like Siriani and we win many more games like that. ...but we have Steele at RT, and coaches who refuse to help him out when he is clearly struggling and failing.....there is a difference.
You tell me. Is Dak the reason why we've lost to the 49ers 3 times in a row?Wins and loses matter for QB evaluation? I thought that was a team stat?