Question for you...Which is closer to the truth...
yeah dak threw it just as 86 broke open, and instead threw to a closely guarded wr. Not all on dak , but he focused entirely on the #1 read and forced it in.Wow, I watched that and you hit that nail square on the head! Shultz was WIDE open! He would've been an EASY TD. It looked like Dak had time to find him, but simply didn't look in that direction.
There could have been more. Just a little bit unlucky.
Interesting.
Romo's an irrelevance, he wasnt a winner either (I never understand why he even get's brought up). The issue here is interesting, (well to me), as ive suffered anxiety concerns and found that my performance would deteriorate when faced with unexpected challenges especially under time constraints.....indeed it resulted in poor, rushed judgement.
I don't see it as a failure, especially when Dak has good overall numbers, including good 4th Quarter Comebacks and Game Winning Drives. Those numbers you posted about being behind in points late in games that have led to losses could be a reflection of late-game penalties on the Oline, RBs or WRs, someone breaking apart or committing drive-killing penalties, thus leading to game losses. It sure isn't Dak throwing game-costing INTs since his overall career INTs are very low and roughly half of what Romo had throughout his career in barely 3 more years of playing time. So one can't simply just blame it on Dak without the proper context and game tape to review for those losses.
Because apportioning blame does not assign blame. If the blame is known, it can be dealt with. With the specific person who creates the cause for this blame.
No it doesn't, it's rating and purely on Dak. The comebacks were quoted in that thread, interestingly most were 2016/2017 and resulted in a FG... when he needed a TD (and especially more recently), he comes up short.
The comparative data would/should be similar to his contemporaries, and with other game scenario's. The fact his figures are so inferior with >2min and trailing and spans numerous roster changes, different OC's and that the only consistent is him touching the ball (unless the Center's to blame) all add up to indications that this is a problem..... oh I nearly forgot, the evidence of the composure meltdown in SF 1 and 2.
Ironic how you failed to mention all the weapons, better Olines and playcallers Cousins, Stafford and Allen had at their disposal compared to Dak. Give Dak some more weapons, better Oline and better playcalling. Then you can compare apples to apples.
....those were career stats. I'm sure Dak's had a comparative (if not better O-line)....First three years didn't he have 3 first round picks.
Uhhh, you even said yourself Dak had more 4th Quarter Comebacks and Game Winning Drives his first 3+ seasons. That's when he had a better Oline. His Oline the past 3 years has been old and often injured. Get him a better/healthier Oline, some weapons and better playcalling, you will see Dak's numbers improve. Next time dissect his career stats and add context to them.
I see you're trying to scrape up an excuse rather than face what's in front of you, so I'll leave you to it.
The defense blitzed, so its in the qb's best interest to get rid of the ball asap. If Dak had went thru reads, found Schultz and got blindsided on the throw by a blitzing player... yall would call him every bad name in the book.Wow, I watched that and you hit that nail square on the head! Shultz was WIDE open! He would've been an EASY TD. It looked like Dak had time to find him, but simply didn't look in that direction.
I'm not saying Dak never takes care of the ball. He's just inconsistent at it enough to prevent a deep playoff run.
News just in....Dak isn't getting younger, and stop the press the O-Line isn't improving any time soon especially as Martin has a couple of years left at best.
I'm not shifting anything. Mike Martz broke down every one of Dak's INTs, and he clearly explained himself how more than half of those INTs were not on Dak...and why not. Now you come up with some lame out-of-context stat to put blame on Dak, yet I just ripped your theory apart. So you refuse to put those end-of-games stats into proper context (including videos to support your thesis), and you believe you know more than Mike Martz?
Great post.
I'm not shifting anything. Mike Martz broke down every one of Dak's INTs, and he clearly explained himself how more than half of those INTs were not on Dak...and why not. Now you come up with some lame out-of-context stat to put blame on Dak, yet I just ripped your theory apart. So you refuse to put those end-of-games stats into proper context (including videos to support your thesis), and you believe you know more than Mike Martz?
LOL
what are you on about, I've never mentioned INTERCEPTION's . That's another Dead Cat, trying to change the dialogue. The stats are stark evidence that Dak's rating >2min (and trailing) is worrying low (in comparison to his general stats and against his peers).
Apples to Oranges when his peers have much better weapons, better Olines and better playcallers. It's not that hard to understand......unless you've got an agenda.
So how come there's no disparity between Dak and peers in all other stats (other than trailing >2m)????
