atlantacowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,553
- Reaction score
- 27,090
Does anybody on the cowboys know how to just shut up?
BS he hired Dave Shula who was not part of the program he had at Miami and it failed, he brings in Turner again a person he had not worked with in the past and Turner ran the offense and that was claimed by Aikman. Jimmy over saw this team which is the job of a HC. You guys are fricken clueless of what a HC does. He is not in charge on 1 side of the ball he has total responsibility over the entire team. This OC and DC success or failure rest on the HC. The team loses that is on his assistant coaches it is on the HC period.
So why has Garrett gone thru so many coordinators and is still left standing? LOL. Oh yeah. Jerry.
Exactly. Dak's looking for a contract, of course he's going to push the company line.Company man
I don't care that he didn't call plays. It was HIS offense and HIS defense.Johnson did not call any plays offense or defense and was here only for 5 years. I love Jimmy Johnson but the facts is he did not call any plays that was given to others. When Dave Shula was hired by him the offense was a joke, the then hired Turner who he had no past with. As for defense the defense was bend but don't break under Wannstead and it was not until they went out and got Haley that it started to change. Again this is not a knock on Johnson, he over saw the entire team which is the primary role of a HC. To act as if the HC is responsible for 1 side of the ball is beyond stupid, HC is in charge of all things taking place on the field. Get a clue
I don't care that he didn't call plays. It was HIS offense and HIS defense.
JG doesn't have anything if it's Moore's offense. I don't really buy that yet, but if Moore can do whatever he wants, there is absolutely nothing that JG can take any ownership of.
So what is Garrett needed for? If this is true, we have the only head coach in history who contributes nothing except making practice schedules and calling timeouts.
Exactly. When we're winning, Garrett was the brain behind everything. He did it all.
When we 're losing, Garrett's like Sergeant Shultz......
The Players just didn't execute, and the rest is all Jerry's fault.
Everything was Jimmy's system in that it was the vision of what he wanted it to be, regardless of what he did at Miami. Turner, Shula, Wannstedt, whoever wouldn't have been there if they did not want to operate under the vision that Jimmy had. JG has been the same way with the offense (though not the defense), and if more has control, it means JG owns nothing.It was his responsibility and his Offense? he did not run the same offense in Miami as he did in Dallas. Emmitt went to Florida instead of Miami because Jimmy did not run the ball that much and Hall did at Florida. So this non sense Jimmy system? it was not his system. Shula was not his system and Turner was not his system 2 very different approaches between Shula and Turner. Jimmy was not a big X and O guy Jimmy was a motivator knowing what buttons to push on any given player to get the most out of them.
Everything was Jimmy's system in that it was the vision of what he wanted it to be, regardless of what he did at Miami. Turner, Shula, Wannstedt, whoever wouldn't have been there if they did not want to operate under the vision that Jimmy had. JG has been the same way with the offense (though not the defense), and if more has control, it means JG owns nothing.
Sure it was. lol
Everything was Jimmy's system in that it was the vision of what he wanted it to be, regardless of what he did at Miami. Turner, Shula, Wannstedt, whoever wouldn't have been there if they did not want to operate under the vision that Jimmy had. JG has been the same way with the offense (though not the defense), and if more has control, it means JG owns nothing.
You guys are arguing in circles. It's not really that hard. Jimmy did not himself design or install the system, but Jimmy did have the choice to use it or not and he had to buy into it before it was used. That's it in a nutshell.
erod, how do you know he got more "involved"? I'm sure that info must have been put out someplace, maybe I just missed it? If true, and it was the offense was more designed by his input, then maybe were all freaking out over his taking command of the offense is foolish. IF it was more on Moore, then I'll take a 7-1 win streak all day...Kellen Moore got a LOT more involved in putting together the game plan when the team was 3-5.
Since then, they went 7-1 and won a playoff game.
So, with a head coach on a one-year deal, it makes sense.
Sure. I don't disagree with that at all. However Jimmy himself talked about his psychology major and that a big part of what he did was how to motivate and get the best out of people. That was a major key for Jimmy. We would see Jimmy jump all over some when they made mistakes yet when a guy like Lett made mistakes Jimmy dealt with it differently because Jimmy knew all people are not wired the same and coming down on Lett would not help get the most out of him. In terms of X and O was never a big aspect of his ability as a HC.
This is all true, and maybe instead of saying Jimmy didn't design or install the system I should have said he didn't design, install or run the system. Bottom line is it wasn't his system in the sense that he actually participated in creating it or making it work, but it was his system in that he chose the defensive coaches, which naturally included choosing to run their defensive system.
He also said the cowboys didnt need a Mr 1 receiver! And he was wrong then.I’ll take Daks word here, and I hope he’s right.
Does anybody on the cowboys know how to just shut up?
I can see Dak's mouth moving but those words might be coming from someone else. Is Booger ambidextrous? Can he work two at once? My, my and both are in contract years.I'm not sure how to take this. Obviously Dak isn't the one that gets to decide how much control Moore gets, so does he know something the coaches haven't said so far?
Yep, he did but we don't know who asked him to say that. And complaining about not having one would be really bad form. Plus, one of his strongest attributes in as a leader and that's what the leader does. Even though when the pass offense was struggling, he did not react to Beasley or Hurns comments that they were getting open. He understands the role of the leader very well.He also said the cowboys didnt need a Mr 1 receiver! And he was wrong then.