you think the defense was good enough? go back and look at all the games we lost and even a game we won.If the defense wasnt feasting on turnovers they were getting beat up front and run on or beat up in short passing game. Look at the AZ game for example they ran it down our throats, San Fran game as well even the detroit game which we won but that didnt have to come down to missed XP. The defense wilted like a cheap suit.If youre expecting dak to score 50 points a game because of the defense youre fooling yourself or if you expect the defense to hold the other team under 20 all the time because of the offense its foolish thinking. complimentary football is lacking with this team because the roster has lacked the much needed playmakers
again I dont care if Dak goes or stays but this simplistic look that if someone else was QB it would be different i just cant buy into. Outside of Mahomes or Prime brady and Manning I just dont see it. This team has failed in many different was whether it was Dak,lack of running game ,poor offensive scheming or a defense that gets shredded like a knife through butter
That falls on the FO failure to put together the type of roster necessary to compete in january and february
The lack of run-defense is only relevant if the team hasn't the offense to counter.
We like to blame the run defense vrs SF Play-Offs (x2), which was poor....but it doesn't distract that Dak had the ball 4 times to pull off a win and a tie in both games.
So looking at the 'holes' that appeared in the GB game, how do we foresee and block all of them?
I'm not saying or blaming Dak, I'm saying build a 2016 O-Line to protect a QB as Dak had and use the saving (as I'd cut him Pre-June) on building in the trenches.
Dak will be on the market in 2025, if that's what we choose....as he's NOT giving a Home Town Discount, no point in pandering and paying him in 2024.