They weren't! Watch the tape.Hey Moron (Dak), if that guy was triple covered someone else must have been free or singled
Find him
Nope he didn't and he can spin it anyway he wants but we know better.Lol. He never saw him. And he sure didn't try to squeeze it by him. There was no heat whatsoever on that throw
How many more years of Jerry as the owner?
Dak’s a buffoon.
How many more years of his crap?
or when you’re down two scores with 3 min left and behind the sticks on third down. but yeahCorrect me if I'm wrong, but isn't it going to always be a tough throw when you decide to toss it to a receiver who is covered by 3 defenders?
So they had 13 on the field?They weren't! Watch the tape.
Don't come in here making sense and providing good insight! You're gonna ruin the mood!Even if Dak threw the TD there. They still lose. As terrible as the defense played and pedestrian the offense was. Dak’s pic was not the reason we lost. McCarthy thought Kellen Moore put Dak in bad situations. He put Dak in the proverbial bad situation.
Just because there were three defenders in the area, that doesnt mean he was triple covered. Especially in the redzone where defenders are everywhere. If you dont believe me, look it up and educate yourself.Hey Moron (Dak), if that guy was triple covered someone else must have been free or singled
Find him
Hopefully he will be benched. I have been screaming this for the last three years. The opposing retread qb was better than dak. Cant anyone see any of this???Dak’s a buffoon.
How many more years of his crap?
hmmm, how can I explain it to you....they were rushing 4, so 7 dropped into coverage. so yeah, its possible somebody else wasn't free. most game our WRs weren't getting open in the end zone. there was plenty of that issue.Hey Moron (Dak), if that guy was triple covered someone else must have been free or singled
Find him