Dak or Romo?

CowboysFaninHouston said:
wait, so its now a team accomplishment? but when we lose its Dak choking and failing? come on now willie
Click to expand...
Yes winning in the playoffs is a team accomplishment. Tom Brady lost a Super Bowl after throwing 500 yards because his defense couldnt get a stop against Nick Foles.

Jimmy G won an NFC championship game by throwing 8 passes.
 
JBS said:
I don’t think there is any question Romo was a better thrower of the football..1000%

But that also isn’t the end all be all of being a QB
Click to expand...
hmm, really? Dak has better stats in many area including completion percentage, TDs per season, interceptions, Y/G and pretty close in other areas. so not so sure he was a better thrower.
 
WillieBeamen said:
Oh you mean the teams with Phil Costa, Mackenzie Bernadeau, Nate Livings, and Doug Free on the OL and Garrett calling the plays?

Yall swore Garrett was the worst coach ever, but never bring that up in these convos
Click to expand...
Dak wouldn't have let us get bounced week 17 3 years in a row. Those olines were enough to get us to that position.
 
stilltheguru said:
Dak wouldn't have let us get bounced week 17 3 years in a row. Those olines were enough to get us to that position.
Click to expand...
Bruh u just chattin now.

Dak has lost two games in week 17 that have sealed our playoff fates. Same as Romo.
 
I would go with Dak. I don't buy this idea that Romo did not have good teams. Romo had some very good teams.

It is very close between these two QBs, but I just think Dak has a slight edge using his legs. Romo was strong on the short and intermediate passing, Dak is a little better with the deeper passes.

This is really the same question as which is better, the Mustang or the Camaro? It's really a close call and honestly if I was given either one I wouldnt complain.
 
TheMarathonContinues said:
Dak. Dak is a better football player and leader than Romo ever was.

Where Romo failed is he wasn't a good leader. He cared more about golf than he did the NFL. Dak's #1 priority is football. It's why Dak was able to lead this team in 2016....soon as he stepped on that field these guys gravitated to him and it's why they never went back to Romo and why he essentially retired Romo.

If Romo couldn't win in 2014 he was never gonna win with this organization.
Click to expand...
100% :hammer:
 
Creeper said:
I would go with Dak. I don't buy this idea that Romo did not have good teams. Romo had some very good teams.

It is very close between these two QBs, but I just think Dak has a slight edge using his legs. Romo was strong on the short and intermediate passing, Dak is a little better with the deeper passes.

This is really the same question as which is better, the Mustang or the Camaro? It's really a close call and honestly if I was given either one I wouldnt complain.
Click to expand...
Lol
 
Both are good! They both deal with the same issues. The inability of their defense to stop the run when needed and the unwillingness of the offensive coordinator/coach to use the run effectively, control the clock/field position. Basic football stuff. I will say that I would have liked to see Parcells coach Dak up. He got the most from Romo but said he was a little unhinged and you had to keep on him and he was right. Dak is totally different in that aspect.
 
TheMarathonContinues said:
Romo sure as hell doesn't belong in the same discussion as Peyton, Aaron, Brady or Warner or Aikman that's for sure lol.
Click to expand...
Yall dont even know what yall are arguing at this point. He said Dak completion % is higher than Romos therefore hes more accurate.

That applies to those QBs as well
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 183 more.
Total: 4,485 (members: 283, guests: 4,202)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,132
Messages
13,790,531
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top