jwitten82
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,466
- Reaction score
- 16,288
Which games?Bruh u just chattin now.
Dak has lost two games in week 17 that have sealed our playoff fates. Same as Romo.
Which games?Bruh u just chattin now.
Dak has lost two games in week 17 that have sealed our playoff fates. Same as Romo.
Hard to compare unless they play with the same rosters and have the same coaches.All Dak has to do is win one playoff game to have more playoff wins and appearances than Romo, and if he makes it the Championship game, which looks like a real possibility if we keep the 2nd seed, then I don't see how anyone can say Romo was better. Y'all seriously overrate Romo. As of right now, I think they're pretty much the same QB but Dak has time to pass him
Damn good point.Dak wouldn't have let us get bounced week 17 3 years in a row. Those olines were enough to get us to that position.
I was a bigger Romo fan than I ever was a Dak fan. But after sitting back objectively I'd rather have dak. Romo is smart but he's a beta and a trash leader with trash work ethic. He has more throwing talent than Dak but I'll take Daks intangibles, mobility, intelligence (he's smart too) over Romo. Romo let multiple teams crumble. Basically garrett took over the leadership from 2011 because Romo couldn't handle it. Jason hatcher admitted this. Romo mentally weakBruh u just chattin now.
Dak has lost two games in week 17 that have sealed our playoff fates. Same as Romo.
Does Dak belong? For all you Daksters dogging Romo for never winning big, remember, those that laugh loudest, laugh last. Better hope Dak does more than Romo has, because all this bragging on Dak could come back to bite you in the arse, just saying.Romo sure as hell doesn't belong in the same discussion as Peyton, Aaron, Brady or Warner or Aikman that's for sure lol.
The discussion is about Romo and Dak. You're throwing in other guys into the argument to back your Romo claim up. I don't even know the point of bringing up Aiikman who played in the 90's....Yall dont even know what yall are arguing at this point. He said Dak completion % is higher than Romos therefore hes more accurate.
That applies to those QBs as well
Nah DF, stop the modesty.Hard to compare unless they play with the same rosters and have the same coaches.
Romo had it really good his first full year as a starter (2007) but I think Dak has had by far the better rosters "on average" throughout his career.
It's all theory and opinion anyway.
Just pull for them both.
Don't celebrate when Dak leads this team to an NFC Championship Game. Keep your loyalty where it belongs......in the past. lolDoes Dak belong? For all you Daksters dogging Romo for never winning big, remember, those that laugh loudest, laugh last. Better hope Dak does more than Romo has, because all this bragging on Dak could come back to bite you in the arse, just saying.
Then why did the OP bring up someone that has long since retired, huh?The discussion is about Romo and Dak. You're throwing in other guys into the argument to back your Romo claim up. I don't even know the point of bringing up Aiikman who played in the 90's....
I've acknowledged that Romo and Dak are having similar careers until Dak gets to the NFC Championship game.Does Dak belong? For all you Daksters dogging Romo for never winning big, remember, those that laugh loudest, laugh last. Better hope Dak does more than Romo has, because all this bragging on Dak could come back to bite you in the arse, just saying.
You need to not step in other peoples debates. The poster i was talking to clearly knew i destroyed his argument.The discussion is about Romo and Dak. You're throwing in other guys into the argument to back your Romo claim up. I don't even know the point of bringing up Aiikman who played in the 90's....
Answer my question, or shut up, one or the other.Don't celebrate when Dak leads this team to an NFC Championship Game. Keep your loyalty where it belongs......in the past. lol
well... especially since they would be 5-11 instead of 8-8 and the QB would also have multiple injuries and maybe no new contractNah DF, stop the modesty.
If Dak had those 8-8 year rosters, there would be nothing but crying on here everyday about how Dak has no help
RomoDon't celebrate when Dak leads this team to an NFC Championship Game. Keep your loyalty where it belongs......in the past. lol
OK, just be careful...I've acknowledged that Romo and Dak are having similar careers until Dak gets to the NFC Championship game.
Nothing will bite me I'm very realistic about what Dak is and where Dak is. I can admit what Dak is. But Romo fans can't seem to do the same for Romo. The only argument Dak has in his favor is he's just 30 and he has a few years left to eclipse this goal. Romo doesn't have it.
He told you why. He said he and his friend are having a discussion on Dak V Romo...this discussion shouldn't be as triggering as it is for some. And it typically wouldn't be. But because Dak is involved this discussion becomes polarizing.Then why did the OP bring up someone that has long since retired, huh?
There's nothing to be careful about lol. I made no predictions. No one Is "laughing" at Romo. ITs just facts.OK, just be careful...
It's not "facts" until the fat lady sings. But, go on with your bad self. You better hope all that bragging about Dak come to light, otherwise...There's nothing to be careful about lol. I made no predictions. No one Is "laughing" at Romo. ITs just facts.
No one holds those 8-8 years against Romo though lol. It's the 2014 and 2007 years that's the issue.Nah DF, stop the modesty.
If Dak had those 8-8 year rosters, there would be nothing but crying on here everyday about how Dak has no help