kevm3
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,820
- Reaction score
- 12,854
While the other had a team that allowed nick foles to go out and win a superbowl and lay 40+ points on defenses like the vikingsOne of them had a RB who rushed for 150+.
While the other had a team that allowed nick foles to go out and win a superbowl and lay 40+ points on defenses like the vikingsOne of them had a RB who rushed for 150+.
While the other had a team that allowed nick foles to go out and win a superbowl and lay 40+ points on defenses like the vikings
Nick Foles got into a zone - and previously got into that zone in 2013 where he looked unstoppable. This...does not diminish anything about Wentz, at all. Not a single credible scout, analyst, or player would come out and say Wentz is anything less because Foles stepped up to the challenge.
On the road. Lesser supporting cast. Conservative gameplan. Went in and beat him, right in the middle of the ring so to speak.
All the tweets, and the smack from our fan base and theirs. The talking heads "Oh I would take Wentz over Dak".
He went in and beat him. There's so much to like with Prescott. Would have hung 350 on them if we just take the training wheels off in the second half and let the guy sling it; which we never do. He always has a huge first half then we go conservative.
That said - he outplayed Wentz. Still take our guy.
If having a backup that's capable of winning a SB, and a starter who's not, in no way diminishes anything about Wentz then sure. Maybe the Eagles will cruise around all year with their true backup guiding the ship then slot Foles in if they make the playoffs ... seeing as Wentz crumbles under the pressure.
If Philly's linebacker doesn't drop a giftwrapped pick 6
Wentz took on many of these same challenges last year and didn't crumble.
Imagine pretending to be stupid to prop up Dak LOL
Wentz didn't take on any challenges last year. He cashed in on an easy schedule (same as Dak did 2 years ago) then Foles did the heavy lifting in the playoffs.
I haven't propped up Dak in this thread. I said Goff is by far and away the best of these 3, and Wentz and Dak can fight it out for 2nd (Wentz benefits from great coaching, Dak does not).
What the hell are you even talking about? He beat 2 playoff teams and faced some pretty good defenses last year and made them all look terrible.
Again, why are you acting stupid JUST to make Dak look better? You don't have to do this to yourself.
LOL And Goff is better? It's funny to me that you're bringing up a supporting cast getting the Eagles to the championship, yet you refuse to look at the players surrounding Goff.
Hop the f out of this thread, boy.
What do I care about what he did other than last year?
I'm simply pointing out the fallacy of just looking at ypc and its impact on a QB. How often did Dak put up stat
So whenever the run game doesn't work you're prepared to blame Dak?
Not going to argue that...hahaI disagree pal. Dak was the better QB last night and I don't think it was close. If Dak had performed like Wentz last night this board would have lit him up.
Not going to argue that...haha
The Dak-a-Zoids are feeling emboldened!
I have already said this on numerous occasions.This thread is so dumb. Is there anyone willing to admit that they would take Dak over Wentz?
That’s what I thought, conversation closed. End dumb thread.
I'd take Foles over both of them though. Better pure pocket passer than Wentz, and Wentz no longer has full mobility because of knee.This thread is so dumb. Is there anyone willing to admit that they would take Dak over Wentz?
That’s what I thought, conversation closed. End dumb thread.
Since when are linebackers known for their catching?
Fun with numbers.
He's #1 because of his rookie year. He's trended the wrong way while guys like Wentz and Goff have trended the other way.