Aviano90
Go Seahawks!!!
- Messages
- 16,758
- Reaction score
- 24,485
Nope.So you are a Seahawks fan right?
Nope.So you are a Seahawks fan right?
Nope.
What's wrong with my avatar?So your Avitar is not factual then?
What's wrong with my avatar?
I can explain this unlike all that previous astrological madness that was spewed. That alleged power disappears when the teams get better. What a coincidence.General rule of thumb, if you can't explain something, you don't really understand it yourself.
Why does this power ("influence") disappear in games like against Philly last year? Or NE? Or NO? Or Buffalo? Or Chicago? Or the Rams?
The user title has "Go Seahawks" but you need to be a zone supporter to change it, which I no longer am. Suffice it to say there was a reason for that update when I was a zone supporter that is no longer applicable but I'm tired of repeating it.I didn't say anything was wrong with it. But it does say "Go Seahawks!" right?
You did not explain it. You mumbled some nonsense to dance around explaining it.I did explain it. I do understand it. But I'm not going to invest a ton of time trying to explain something to someone who absolutely doesn't want to understand. You've already dug your heals in and every attempt and trying to show you otherwise is wasted effort.
It disappears in some games and instances because it isn't magic. It's a factor. Sometimes it is a huge factor. But it is only one factor.
Prove it.He would have improved the play at QB. Whew that was easy.
That makes sense. Better teams have better, magic zapping technology.I can explain this unlike all that previous astrological madness that was spewed. That alleged power disappears when the teams get better. What a coincidence.
The user title has "Go Seahawks" but you need to be a zone supporter to change it, which I no longer am. Suffice it to say there was a reason for that update when I was a zone supporter that is no longer applicable but I'm tired of repeating it.
That makes sense. Better teams have better, magic zapping technology.
yeah, I understand. I should have recognized the user name before responding to you. I don't mind being corrected about something. When I state something that is factually incorrect, I like to know when I've gotten it wrong. You took offense to it. I said my bad but you don't want to drop it. I should have known better. Again, my bad.So then, you would say you don't really need me to "explain it to you", the whole Seahawks thing so to speak. Would that be an accurate statement?
You see how that works? You see, I was a MOD here for a very long time. I understand the situation and I've seen you address this in the past. I asked the question for a reason. I get it but I need you to see that this is what it's like. Do you understand what I am saying to you?
What really turned me off to Dak was going into this past offseason, after that miserable loss to Philly and the team not making the playoffs, Dak turning down a big contract. Call it bad timing, whatever, but that really pissed me off and soured me on Dak.no denying that pathetic performance....
but that's why garrett is no longer here.......and there were plenty of games that we should have won and never come down to that game...yes, lets not forget
Dak didn't turn down a big contract. the sticking point was the 5th year. he wanted a 4 year (cheaper) contract.What really turned me off to Dak was going into this past offseason, after that miserable loss to Philly and the team not making the playoffs, Dak turning down a big contract. Call it bad timing, whatever, but that really pissed me off and soured me on Dak.
You did not explain it. You mumbled some nonsense to dance around explaining it.
I've asked you specific questions...why do you avoid them?
You can't explain it, because it's a cliche.
You didn't say anything. You offered an excuse for why you couldn't explain it. There was nothing for me to dismiss.I didn't avoid anything. In fact, I said you would just dismiss everything I said. Then you proceeded to dismiss everything I said. You are not worth my time or effort.
yeah, I understand. I should have recognized the user name before responding to you. I don't mind being corrected about something. When I state something that is factually incorrect, I like to know when I've gotten it wrong. You took offense to it. I said my bad but you don't want to drop it. I should have known better. Again, my bad.
So then, you would say you don't really need me to "explain it to you", the whole Seahawks thing so to speak. Would that be an accurate statement?
You see how that works? You see, I was a MOD here for a very long time. I understand the situation and I've seen you address this in the past. I asked the question for a reason. I get it but I need you to see that this is what it's like. Do you understand what I am saying to you?
I have to admire what you did there. Like a boss.