Dak Prescott is better than Derek Carr and it’s not even close

[jday]

Yeah trust me I LOVE we have Dak and thankful we didn't have to really suffer through life after Romo but we have to put things in perspective. Dak has only played one season. Carr has done it a little longer.

I agree. But the only thing Dak lacks is time of service. Three years from now I suspect this debate will be put to bed with little need for further discussion.

 

[bigbob]

All this talk about best offensive line in football is hyperbole at it's finest. At the end of the day, how our OL compares to the Raiders OL simply doesn't matter. You don't have to have the best of anything to win a Super Bowl. You just don't want to have the weakest of anything. Because if you are the weakest in any phase of the game there's a good chance you won't even make the playoffs...much less the Super Bowl.

I'm content with the knowledge that the offense as a whole is easily top 10...possibly top 5. Our Special Teams skill players collectively are top 5. The question remaining is our defense...alot of things are going to have go right for the defensive group to even provide status quo from a year ago.

Good point look at weakness.
Would you say our coaches are a weakness?
I think at times they are
Then the def may be or will be till they prove otherwise.

 

[jday]

Good point look at weakness.
Would you say our coaches are a weakness?
I think at times they are
Then the def may be or will be till they prove otherwise.

Our coaches might not be the best, but since Jimmy we've seen much worse coaching staffs.

You have to love the direction of the team...much of that has Garrett's fingerprints. The offense was perfectly tailored to Dak's game on the fly following Romo's injury. So in a sense, were there such a thing, Linahan would have been a Pro Bowler, imho. Lastly, Marinelli fielded a defense that for the most part did their job. It was neither spectacular or terrible as some pundits would have you to believe.

Given that collective consideration, are you willing to chance losing that for the next Jerry hire?

I know you didn't necessarily suggest we fire them, but if that's off the table, I'm going to have to learn to accept the occasional mistake... because no amount of rage-induced-strokes on my part will fix it or prevent them from happening.

 

[bigbob]

Our coaches might not be the best, but since Jimmy we've seen much worse coaching staffs.

You have to love the direction of the team...much of that has Garrett's fingerprints. The offense was perfectly tailored to Dak's game on the fly following Romo's injury. So in a sense, were there such a thing, Linahan would have been a Pro Bowler, imho. Lastly, Marinelli fielded a defense that for the most part did their job. It was neither spectacular or terrible as some pundits would have you to believe.

Given that collective consideration, are you willing to chance losing that for the next Jerry hire?

I know you didn't necessarily suggest we fire them, but if that's off the table, I'm going to have to learn to accept the occasional mistake... because no amount of rage-induced-strokes on my part will fix it or prevent them from happening.

Yeah no telling what Jerry would hire
to replace them!
And at times they do good things then
Boom they do something really dumb.
I think they rarely have good game plans.

In gb game marinelli thought he
Could sub players early on but Rodgers
made fool of him.
Then Butler was sent in then called
back out which was a mistake that cost
them.
This was biggest game of the year
and coaches can't make mistakes like
those.