Yobwocs
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,161
- Reaction score
- 4,415
He did? Then explain 7-9 the season before his arrival.
Explain the 4-12 record we had before Dak showed up.
He did? Then explain 7-9 the season before his arrival.
Their QB was a turnover machine.He did? Then explain 7-9 the season before his arrival.
Their QB was a turnover machine.
Sometimes they are, especially if they are intentionally misused to push a biased agenda, which frequently occurs on this board.Yet he finished the season #1 overall. If their offense was so stacked they don't finish 7-9.
It just goes to show that stats, especially empty stats, are sometimes totally meaningless.
Explain the 4-12 record we had before Dak showed up.
Sometimes they are, especially if they are intentionally misused to push a biased agenda, which frequently occurs on this board.
Easy - Jason Garrett. That pile of manure couldn't put together but 1 win while missing only 1 piece of his offense. It was vital piece, but still, he only managed to rally the troops for 1 damn win.
You wanna know why Dak was so good his rookie year? There's an easy answer for that too. NFL DC's didn't have any tape to go through for tendencies, etc. Dak wasn't expected to start the whole season so there was no preparation for him. Dak declined towards the end of 2016 as game tape became abundant.
All rookies should have this same advantage, right?Easy - Jason Garrett. That pile of manure couldn't put together but 1 win while missing only 1 piece of his offense. It was vital piece, but still, he only managed to rally the troops for 1 damn win.
You wanna know why Dak was so good his rookie year? There's an easy answer for that too. NFL DC's didn't have any tape to go through for tendencies, etc. Dak wasn't expected to start the whole season so there was no preparation for him. Dak declined towards the end of 2016 as game tape became abundant.
I don't think that's the reason. It is more likely it is used because "dink and dak" has been one of the major criticisms from the Dak haters in his career. This stat blows that baseless criticism out of the water.Its pretty funny you say this.... his homers are using this excuse as the sole reason he should be paid this ridiculous amount of money. Talk about biased agendas.
Discrediting Dak while crediting Brady for a turnaround seems quite dishonest, given how Dak turned Dallas around by 9 games and Brady only by 4 games.
If Dak haters didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.Discrediting Dak while crediting Brady for a turnaround seems quite dishonest, given how Dak turned Dallas around by 9 games and Brady only by 4 games.
If Dak haters didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.
Well, I don't think any player in the NFL deserves to make what they are making, but I can't control that. I get you guys are unwilling to accept how QBs in the NFL get paid, but you can't change that either.Whats crazy is that I'm not a Dak hater. I just don't think he's elite like others do, and he shouldn't get a Mahomes level contract just for his personal stats. Mahomes is a generational talent while Dak is closer to the dime-a-dozen variety.
I'm going with DINK!Dak n dunk or is it dink n dak?
Wasn't Dink a pretty good athlete in the movie My Dog Skip???????????????? Ha-haaaaaaDak n dunk or is it dink n dak?
If Dak haters didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all.