Signed by Cowboys Dak Prescott on a four-year contract, $240 million extension

BHendri5

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,169
Reaction score
1,420
Dak has looked good today, for someone that did not play a down in the preseason and the Oline has looked good today against a great defense, the defense has definitely looked good, I don't care if they do have subs starting at the Tackle spot, we have rookies starting. If the shoe was on the other foot no one would be giving us a pass for starting 2/3/4/5 string guys.
The running game has showed glimpses of being able to hold it's own which points to the play of the Line.
I will say this ,I don't believe Deshaun Watson's shoulder is completely healed.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,227
Reaction score
20,259
That was 2012. Hardy was a big chunk of change in 2015. I expect the Cowboys to extend Bland early next offseason. They will try to entice Tyler Smith to sign but that will be harder because of he will probably want tackle money. Parsons will be like CeeDee and Dak. It will be the talking point of next offseason. The Cowboys will have some big time cap room next season.
Bland is going to be the difficult one as Diggs already makes a big contract at the position
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,600
Reaction score
18,251
Bland is going to be the difficult one as Diggs already makes a big contract at the position
It depends on what he wants. The Cowboys have the space and usually signs their own. I don’t think Bland will break the bank.
 

BusDriver

Well-Known Member
Messages
240
Reaction score
359
Post 977
I’m done responding to you.
Post 1053
I have you running around like you have ants in your pants. I’ve never even seen you on this board. No one takes you seriously
Who has ants in their pants? Can’t even live in integrity to your own words mere minutes before. Who has who running around? You can’t even keep your word to be done responding and you think we take you seriously? Your post count ratio to mine in this thread is prob 100:1 but I can’t be exact bc I haven’t read every post like you. Talk about ants in the pants. You care more about your self perceived internet message board relevancy and painting #4$$ on your face than trying to comprehend why almost 70% on this board didn’t wish to sign Dak to an extension. But you sure keep wasting posts trying to tell us all our reasons and you still get it wrong.

You confuse the comedy you deliver on repeat with relevancy and mattering, hence your declarations about what things mean to others or what their feelings about a topic are. You think so highly of yourself to tell others what they actually think and mean but it’s all cute and entertaining projection that you always attack the messenger rather than the message and then try to play it off as being more relevant or whatever makes you feel like a “better fan.”

You “better fans” are why Jerry has no motivation to change his ways and improve the team y’all love to blame. Better for Jerry’s balance sheet.

None of Dak’s stats were in the top 15 today, besides his game check. Killer instinct 2nd to none today. Carried by the D again, so pretty easy to see why y’all blame the D when they lose, damn them for not carrying the top paid player, how dare they.

Do us a favor and keep your word to not respond to me anymore.
 
Last edited:

Preoccupied

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,014
Reaction score
1,033
60 pages, Jesus Christ. Did Romo split the forum like this. I really can't be bothered to remember (He did come to think of it).

Well he's here for 4 more years.

If he gets a SB win, the Positive Camp wins.
If he does not the Negative Camp get to say "Told you so"

4 more years of both camps at it until something gives.....
hmmm.
 

Playmaker3128

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,113
Reaction score
6,939
Unfortunately in the nfl qb play is so sub par you have guys like dak getting 60 mil simply because he’s in the top 10 qbs. Supply and demand.

Now I will say that was a good performance vs a good defense today…. Need to see more of that
 
Top