Dak vs. Hurts

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,457
Reaction score
11,571
LOL............ironic. I knew the trolls would blame Dak for an early fumble saying he cost them the SB, but to say Hurts did is just laughable.

Some of you fans will just never understand football. OR just be too QB challenged to even understand the concept of team and football.

Hurts was other worldly out there. Even a fluke fumble for a TD didnt tarnish his day.
He had a great game against a horrible defense, and still lost. Today is a good day. I think the only people more mad than a eagles fan, is the closet eagle fans on this forum
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
39,731
Reaction score
44,929
Ok so most likely the answer is no you didn't and still blamed him. Thanks for answering by not answering.
I thought Dak played an outstanding game Against the Packers in the playoffs in 2016.
Don't see what bearing that has on Dak throwing all the picks this year, but there ya go.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
He had a great game against a horrible defense, and still lost. Today is a good day. I think the only people more mad than a eagles fan, is the closet eagle fans on this forum
Who was it that had a great day against a horrible defense?
 

LatinMind

iPhotoshop
Messages
17,457
Reaction score
11,571
Who was it that had a great day against a horrible defense?
Hurts, but kc defense was opportunistic and made a couple plays that got them back in it and a couple that changed the game for them in the 2nd half. Still doesn't mean kc isn't a bad defense
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Hurts, but kc defense was opportunistic and made a couple plays that got them back in it and a couple that changed the game for them in the 2nd half. Still doesn't mean kc isn't a bad defense
Buddy, the KC defense was #2 in pass rush defense this year. They also had the #3 player in DOP honors. The Chiefs defense is good. Far from bad as you state.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,859
Reaction score
15,962
So, this has 'zero to do with Dak' and then you turn it into Dak.
Dak would have done the same thing he tends to do when face with adversity, hides.
It doesn't have to be about Dak at all but you are obsessed with him so I used the example.

10 other QBs would have won that game as well.
The Eagles were loaded for bear and Hurts was not asked to make a plus throw all game.
Her played very well overall but same way Brock Purdy did pre-injury.
Benefit of great blocking plus guys making plays for you it is pretty hard to not succeed.
 

GuitarBytes

Well-Known Member
Messages
327
Reaction score
320
what a silly comment, there is no comparison, Hurts, QB who in his second year led the team to the SB, and already has experience of playing one and losing to a great, like Mahomes, and he can continue to improve, Dak, 7 years in the league and he has not been lead the team to a divisional championship, he is fickle, he has a big mouth saying that he is going to improve and he remains the same. is there a comparison?
 

slick325

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,462
Reaction score
9,266
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The Eagles have the best QB in the division going into next season.

Prescott isn't too far off, but the Jones family need more playmakers on both sides of the ball. Free agency, trade and draft need to be used to bridge the gap.
 

noshame

I'm not dead yet......
Messages
14,789
Reaction score
13,260
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan

He never had the burst though. The thing that separates Hurts and some of these other guys is you can have guys all around them & they have the burst to escape. Dak is very slow to get up to speed. Why he gets caught so many times when it looks like he has a big opening.
Yeah hes clearly not the same guy as hurts but he could be more effective if he moved around. At least serviceable
 

Philmonroe

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,623
Reaction score
5,031
How about you wait until Dak get's to a super bowl before making a comparison like this?

Oh nooooooooooooooo, another player made a bad play IN THE SUPER BOWL. Meanwhile, little Dakkie can't even get to the NFCCG.
These Dak male groupies are something else. I wish they’d get a life, girlfriend, job something smh.
 

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,135
Reaction score
28,689
The Eagles have the best QB in the division going into next season.

Prescott isn't too far off, but the Jones family need more playmakers on both sides of the ball. Free agency, trade and draft need to be used to bridge the gap.
you mean If dak had that many playmakers he as good or better then Hurts, they have a better OL, deeper at WR, TE a bit better, RB maybe equal. better play calling/offense=eagles

Dak still put 40 on their defense, more then Mahomes and yes Mahomy got 2 fumbles and big time long Punt return to aid in those offensive points..

daks 7-3 against the eagles all time
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
117 INTs is only 13 INTs short of doubling 65 INTs. Not that hard to figure out.
This is what you said: "double the amount of INTs and fumbles in almost the same amount of games played"

So based on my reply:

Romo 150 games played 117 int's 62 fumbles

Dak 97 games played 65 int's 52 fumbles

So Romo had 179 int's/fumbles (not all fumbles turned over) compared to Dak's 117 int's/fumbles


Based on your original comment of Romo having DOUBLE the amount of fumbles and int's as Dak, shouldn;t Romo have had 130 int's and 104 fumbles???? Also, according to you they played in almost the same amount of games.....so perhaps your math is different but how is 97 games almsot the same as 150 games?????

So again how did Romo have double the amount of fumbles and int's as Dak in almost as many games? Oh wait, he didn't so again you are lying about things to try and falsely prove a point.
 
Top