Shane612
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,156
- Reaction score
- 5,720
You went to promIf you get there, and lose, it's all the same.
You stayed home from prom.
Doesn't sound the same to me.
You went to promIf you get there, and lose, it's all the same.
LOL. Dude. Hurts threw for 300, ran for another 70 and 3 TDs. Yeah he fumbled but he didn't throw a pick.This has zero to do with Dak.
If any player fumbles into a fumble-6 it is VERY costly. In a game decided with seconds left it is obviously more critical.
Hurts was really good all day but that play was insanely costly. With the way Hurts played had he not fumbled that into a Chiefs TD, the game would have literally been over at halftime.
The Chiefs only had a handful of 2nd half possessions.
If Dak was QBing that Eagles team yesterday they probably win by 10.
Outside QB and TE I am not sure the Chiefs had an advantage in any other position on the field.
Hurts is a good player but anyone who actually watches QBs saw limitations yesterday.
More lies seeing as how I didn't think Romo was worthy of that big contract but keep on growing that nose Pinocchio.You tell me? You're the Romo diehard around here.
Yes, bloke, I could see how the misfortune of a great QB in THE SUPER BOWL would be comforting to a JAG (Deek) who has never advanced past the first round of the playoffs.They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
117 vs 65? Yes, almost double.This is what you said: "double the amount of INTs and fumbles in almost the same amount of games played"
So based on my reply:
Romo 150 games played 117 int's 62 fumbles
Dak 97 games played 65 int's 52 fumbles
So Romo had 179 int's/fumbles (not all fumbles turned over) compared to Dak's 117 int's/fumbles
Based on your original comment of Romo having DOUBLE the amount of fumbles and int's as Dak, shouldn;t Romo have had 130 int's and 104 fumbles???? Also, according to you they played in almost the same amount of games.....so perhaps your math is different but how is 97 games almsot the same as 150 games?????
So again how did Romo have double the amount of fumbles and int's as Dak in almost as many games? Oh wait, he didn't so again you are lying about things to try and falsely prove a point.
The title and OP is supposedly about Dak.It doesn't have to be about Dak at all but you are obsessed with him so I used the example.
10 other QBs would have won that game as well.
The Eagles were loaded for bear and Hurts was not asked to make a plus throw all game.
Her played very well overall but same way Brock Purdy did pre-injury.
Benefit of great blocking plus guys making plays for you it is pretty hard to not succeed.
You said, if it doesn't happen all the time and with Dakota "WENTZ 2.0" Prescot it happened all the time! His constant turnovers put the defense behind the 8 ball almost every game, this is why Parsons spoke out after the 9er game that WENTZ 2.0's turnovers cost them the game!They both have something in common now. Both cost their team an important game with a turnover. If that was Dak fumbling away a TD in the Super Bowl, half the threads on the board would be trade or cut Dak threads or Dak sucks threads. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play. You have to live with it as long as it doesn’t keep repeating itself.
He may be better…but Philly has an elite TE, and 2 Elite receivers…if that was Lamb caught up in traffic on that TD pass to Brown…Lamb does not make the catch. The Cowboys don‘t like playmakers or players with speed. And their OL is light years more effective than ours…What Hurts showed last night is that he is far better than Dak. It's not even close.
I'm just pointing out how the people go from one to the other depending on what they are trying to prove or defend.apparently...if we're elevating jalen.
so..
was it jalen or the team?
you tell me.
Really? He made several very high level throws.The Eagles were loaded for bear and Hurts was not asked to make a plus throw all game.
Someone else would have gotten blamed entirely for the loss with that fumble for 6.Really? He made several very high level throws.
He played outstanding other than the one gaffe.
Nah. Jim Kelly and those guys are in the Hall of Fame too.If you get there, and lose, it's all the same.
Yah, after last nights performance Hurts has proven the doubters wrong. He definitely took the next step. Now he has an all world team and Oline around him, but he makes plays, big plays with both legs and his arm.The Eagles have the best QB in the division going into next season.
Prescott isn't too far off, but the Jones family need more playmakers on both sides of the ball. Free agency, trade and draft need to be used to bridge the gap.
Context matters though. Dak getting us to SB in his second season as starter and having one fumble, no he wouldn't get fully blamed.Someone else would have gotten blamed entirely for the loss with that fumble for 6.
Yeah no, there are fans here that have voodoo dolls of Dak fired up after we win a game.Context matters though. Dak getting us to SB in his second season as starter and having one fumble, no he wouldn't get fully blamed.
Dak with 7 years of history of not performing well against high level competition and of having turnovers, yes.