Dak vs. Hurts

Cowboys1966

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
1,253
I'm embarrassed for anyone who kneels down before the Eagles, as if our little brother's ONE measly Super Bowl ring 6 seasons ago somehow matches up to our rich history.

They aren't ****. Period.

Super Bowl titles don't expire. That's why it means so much to win one.

5 > 1
History… You said it. What have you done for me lately… Not a heckuva lot.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
17,653
History… You said it. What have you done for me lately… Not a heckuva lot.
2017 is ancient history too. That was all the way back when people thought Carson Wentz was a surefire future HOFer.

At least OUR history includes 5 Super Bowl titles.

5 > 1

They'll always be our little brothers. Shame on any Cowboys fan for forgetting that.
 

Cowboys1966

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
1,253
2017 is ancient history too. That was all the way back when people thought Carson Wentz was a surefire future HOFer.

At least OUR history includes 5 Super Bowl titles.

5 > 1

They'll always be our little brothers. Shame on any Cowboys fan for forgetting that.
Way back in 2017… LOL did they have cars then? Let’s call it the year 20 AC… After Cowboys won. Lol.

JJ counts on fans like you though… So he can keep ringing that cash register with zero accountability.
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
2017 is ancient history too. That was all the way back when people thought Carson Wentz was a surefire future HOFer.

At least OUR history includes 5 Super Bowl titles.

5 > 1

They'll always be our little brothers. Shame on any Cowboys fan for forgetting that.
NFC Championship game appearances since Dallas' last NFC Championship appearance in 1995-96:

Philadelphia: 7
Dallas: 0

So while Dallas has won more Super Bowls than Philly, Dallas has done nothing since 1995-96 so to flaunt the number of Super Bowls is silly.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
17,653
NFC Championship game appearances since Dallas' last NFC Championship appearance in 1995-96:

Philadelphia: 7
Dallas: 0

So while Dallas has won more Super Bowls than Philly, Dallas has done nothing since 1995-96 so to flaunt the number of Super Bowls is silly.
Nobody gives a rat's *** about NFC Championship appearances.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

1 winner, 31 losers.

5 > 1
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
17,653
Well I would think any team in the NFC with Super Bowl aspirations care about a NFC Championship appearance.
Getting close and then losing isn't anything to gloat about.

So again, nobody gives a rat's *** about the Eagles choking on the big stage.

We've closed the deal 5 times.

They've closed the deal ONCE.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 

Cowboys1966

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
1,253
Getting close and then losing isn't anything to gloat about.

So again, nobody gives a rat's *** about the Eagles choking on the big stage.

We've closed the deal 5 times.

They've closed the deal ONCE.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
But it’s a step in the right direction. I don’t know how old you are, but for a lot of cowboys fans they don’t even remember that era… Perhaps to them, it being so long ago, with zero memory of it, so it sounds kind of Hollow.

The Cowboys have the better overall history… But our glory days were decades ago. The Eagles do have the bragging rights for 21st-century success… Heck even the Giants blow us away in that regard. Thank God for the Washington ***s.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
17,653
But it’s a step in the right direction. I don’t know how old you are, but for a lot of cowboys fans they don’t even remember that era… Perhaps to them, it being so long ago, with zero memory of it, so it sounds kind of Hollow.

The Cowboys have the better overall history… But our glory days were decades ago. The Eagles do have the bragging rights for 21st-century success… Heck even the Giants blow us away in that regard. Thank God for the Washington ***s.
It's a "step in the right direction" ONLY IF they eventually win the Super Bowl with their core.

If they DON'T eventually win a Super Bowl?

Then it was merely a step in dog ****. A golden opportunity that they choked away.

5 > 1
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
It's a "step in the right direction" ONLY IF they eventually win the Super Bowl with their core.

If they DON'T eventually win a Super Bowl?

Then it was merely a step in dog ****. A golden opportunity that they choked away.

5 > 1
So based on that if Dak leads Dallas to the Super Bowl but loses then he is dog s*** and wasted an opportunity.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
17,653
So based on that if Dak leads Dallas to the Super Bowl but loses then he is dog s*** and wasted an opportunity.
Who did I call dog ****?

Wasted opportunity? Absolutely.

Philly's wasted a ton of those this century. That's why they still aren't ****.

5 > 1
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
Who did I call dog ****?

Wasted opportunity? Absolutely.

Philly's wasted a ton of those this century. That's why they still aren't ****.

5 > 1
Well I hope people stop crediting Dak for "achieving for Dallas what no QB has done recently by winning a playoff game to get to the divisional round" since that is meaningless.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
17,653
Well I hope people stop crediting Dak for "achieving for Dallas what no QB has done recently by winning a playoff game to get to the divisional round" since that is meaningless.
Then why don't you take your own advice and stop hyping our little brothers who couldn't close the deal?

Philly was favored to win. They led by 10 at halftime. Then they CHOKED and lost.

5 > 1
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
Then why don't you take your own advice and stop hyping our little brothers who couldn't close the deal?

Philly was favored to win. They led by 10 at halftime. Then they CHOKED and lost.

5 > 1
You repeating Philly lost in the Super Bowl and using 5>1 is meaningless seeing as how Philly has been more successful than Dallas the last 25+ years....but you do you.
 

GMO415

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,351
Reaction score
26,116
Dak put a 40 burger on the iggles def. Hurst could barely put up half of that.
 

Cowboys1966

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
1,253
It's a "step in the right direction" ONLY IF they eventually win the Super Bowl with their core.

If they DON'T eventually win a Super Bowl?

Then it was merely a step in dog ****. A golden opportunity that they choked away.

5 > 1
Dude, it’s a step in the right direction PERIOD. Who knows if they ever win one with this group, but to word it the way you word it is weak. We would love to someday have that “golden opportunity “.
 

Cowboys1966

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
1,253
Dak put a 40 burger on the iggles def. Hurst could barely put up half of that.
More nonsense. Accept the reality, Dak sucks… And cherry picking one result versus a quarterback who turned the ball over a bunch is pretty weak.
With the quarterback deficit the way it’s looking, we are going to have to be better than them on almost all other facets of the game. I do think our defence is better than their defense… In spite of their sack numbers. I also think we have the potential to be better at a lot of other position groups.
we have work to do at TE, WR, C, OT… And probably even running back. I didn’t mention quarterback because it’s pointless. The idiot Jones will stay with Dak at least one more year. This is a key off-season, our window is running out and if we don’t go for it now it won’t be long before it’s rebuild time.
 

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
17,653
You repeating Philly lost in the Super Bowl and using 5>1 is meaningless seeing as how Philly has been more successful than Dallas the last 25+ years....but you do you.
Why are you choosing "25+ years" as the timeframe?

What if you extend that "25+ years" to "30 years"? You won't do that because then it'd be 3-1, advantage Cowboys.

Or what if you didn't offer a qualifier at all? Which franchise has been MUCH more successful overall?

5 > 1

They're our little brothers no matter how anyone tries to spin it. Getting close and then losing doesn't mean jack **** to me.
:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
 

Cowboys1966

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,375
Reaction score
1,253
Why are you choosing "25+ years" as the timeframe?

What if you extend that "25+ years" to "30 years"? You won't do that because then it'd be 3-1, advantage Cowboys.

Or what if you didn't offer a qualifier at all? Which franchise has been MUCH more successful overall?

5 > 1

They're our little brothers no matter how anyone tries to spin it. Getting close and then losing doesn't mean jack **** to me.
:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
Fair point. Let’s just say this century and leave it at that…

Bottom line, the fact that we have done nothing for almost 3 decades really takes a lot of wind out of our sail when it comes to bragging about Super Bowl totals. Now I’m talking about how objective people think here…Trolls have their own unique way of looking at things lol.
 
Top