Cowboys1966
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,375
- Reaction score
- 1,253
Not enough.Which guy owns the NFC East?
Not enough.Which guy owns the NFC East?
History… You said it. What have you done for me lately… Not a heckuva lot.I'm embarrassed for anyone who kneels down before the Eagles, as if our little brother's ONE measly Super Bowl ring 6 seasons ago somehow matches up to our rich history.
They aren't ****. Period.
Super Bowl titles don't expire. That's why it means so much to win one.
5 > 1
2017 is ancient history too. That was all the way back when people thought Carson Wentz was a surefire future HOFer.History… You said it. What have you done for me lately… Not a heckuva lot.
Way back in 2017… LOL did they have cars then? Let’s call it the year 20 AC… After Cowboys won. Lol.2017 is ancient history too. That was all the way back when people thought Carson Wentz was a surefire future HOFer.
At least OUR history includes 5 Super Bowl titles.
5 > 1
They'll always be our little brothers. Shame on any Cowboys fan for forgetting that.
NFC Championship game appearances since Dallas' last NFC Championship appearance in 1995-96:2017 is ancient history too. That was all the way back when people thought Carson Wentz was a surefire future HOFer.
At least OUR history includes 5 Super Bowl titles.
5 > 1
They'll always be our little brothers. Shame on any Cowboys fan for forgetting that.
Nobody gives a rat's *** about NFC Championship appearances.NFC Championship game appearances since Dallas' last NFC Championship appearance in 1995-96:
Philadelphia: 7
Dallas: 0
So while Dallas has won more Super Bowls than Philly, Dallas has done nothing since 1995-96 so to flaunt the number of Super Bowls is silly.
Well I would think any team in the NFC with Super Bowl aspirations care about a NFC Championship appearance.Nobody gives a rat's *** about NFC Championship appearances.
1 winner, 31 losers.
5 > 1
Getting close and then losing isn't anything to gloat about.Well I would think any team in the NFC with Super Bowl aspirations care about a NFC Championship appearance.
But it’s a step in the right direction. I don’t know how old you are, but for a lot of cowboys fans they don’t even remember that era… Perhaps to them, it being so long ago, with zero memory of it, so it sounds kind of Hollow.Getting close and then losing isn't anything to gloat about.
So again, nobody gives a rat's *** about the Eagles choking on the big stage.
We've closed the deal 5 times.
They've closed the deal ONCE.
It's a "step in the right direction" ONLY IF they eventually win the Super Bowl with their core.But it’s a step in the right direction. I don’t know how old you are, but for a lot of cowboys fans they don’t even remember that era… Perhaps to them, it being so long ago, with zero memory of it, so it sounds kind of Hollow.
The Cowboys have the better overall history… But our glory days were decades ago. The Eagles do have the bragging rights for 21st-century success… Heck even the Giants blow us away in that regard. Thank God for the Washington ***s.
So based on that if Dak leads Dallas to the Super Bowl but loses then he is dog s*** and wasted an opportunity.It's a "step in the right direction" ONLY IF they eventually win the Super Bowl with their core.
If they DON'T eventually win a Super Bowl?
Then it was merely a step in dog ****. A golden opportunity that they choked away.
5 > 1
Who did I call dog ****?So based on that if Dak leads Dallas to the Super Bowl but loses then he is dog s*** and wasted an opportunity.
Well I hope people stop crediting Dak for "achieving for Dallas what no QB has done recently by winning a playoff game to get to the divisional round" since that is meaningless.Who did I call dog ****?
Wasted opportunity? Absolutely.
Philly's wasted a ton of those this century. That's why they still aren't ****.
5 > 1
Then why don't you take your own advice and stop hyping our little brothers who couldn't close the deal?Well I hope people stop crediting Dak for "achieving for Dallas what no QB has done recently by winning a playoff game to get to the divisional round" since that is meaningless.
You repeating Philly lost in the Super Bowl and using 5>1 is meaningless seeing as how Philly has been more successful than Dallas the last 25+ years....but you do you.Then why don't you take your own advice and stop hyping our little brothers who couldn't close the deal?
Philly was favored to win. They led by 10 at halftime. Then they CHOKED and lost.
5 > 1
Dude, it’s a step in the right direction PERIOD. Who knows if they ever win one with this group, but to word it the way you word it is weak. We would love to someday have that “golden opportunity “.It's a "step in the right direction" ONLY IF they eventually win the Super Bowl with their core.
If they DON'T eventually win a Super Bowl?
Then it was merely a step in dog ****. A golden opportunity that they choked away.
5 > 1
More nonsense. Accept the reality, Dak sucks… And cherry picking one result versus a quarterback who turned the ball over a bunch is pretty weak.Dak put a 40 burger on the iggles def. Hurst could barely put up half of that.
Why are you choosing "25+ years" as the timeframe?You repeating Philly lost in the Super Bowl and using 5>1 is meaningless seeing as how Philly has been more successful than Dallas the last 25+ years....but you do you.
Fair point. Let’s just say this century and leave it at that…Why are you choosing "25+ years" as the timeframe?
What if you extend that "25+ years" to "30 years"? You won't do that because then it'd be 3-1, advantage Cowboys.
Or what if you didn't offer a qualifier at all? Which franchise has been MUCH more successful overall?
5 > 1
They're our little brothers no matter how anyone tries to spin it. Getting close and then losing doesn't mean jack **** to me.