blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,748
- Reaction score
- 29,431
Not interesting at all. Trying to find any morsel to say Rush is better and hes not. rush has been in the NFL 5+ years correct on and off the PS so many times exposed to teams and for soem reason hes still a backup, one that fans 4 weeks ago hated and said Jerry was stupid and risking the season by keeping him when dak got hurt.. lmao now Hes all of sudden in debate with a Bonafide Starter.I dont get why you have to come across as bitter/salty in your posts. Everyone is different I guess.
I just find it odd that a lot of media personalities were queuing in on phrases like "Rush isnt afraid to get rid of the ball(Tony Romo even made the below the belt jab)" and "Rush is decisive"...
It comes across as if Dak has certain flaws. I think everyone here knows Dak is the better QB with blitzs. My main point of this thread was IF Rush does have certain characteristics that might make him better at beating the zone/2 High/whatever better than Dak(and since we know teams are going to throw that at Dak)...would you ride with Rush or Dak if defense is playing stellar up until playoffs with no major injuries?
Doesnt seem like a question to get bitter/salty over? I understand you might be frustrated with the Rush vs Dak talk...I tried to produce an interesting spin on a situation that a front office could have to make a tough decision on. Im sure most will just say that you roll with the 40M dollar man.
go check out @Xwalkers posts when he actually brings in real data to debate , you have zero idea which games and how many snaps Dak has played zone the last 6 years vs Rushes 4 entire career games and how that measures up to be true or not..its a guess. maybe he can help you. i say if this is true Teams will exploit Rush and change the way they play him..let me know when rush has 50+ starts under his belt we can have a conversation