Yeagermeister
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,629
- Reaction score
- 117
Go Heat because Dallas whooped my team in the first round
Yeah, someone at city hall leaked it. Someone just had to get their name in the paper. True, plans for a parade have to be made in advance, however, you don't allow that to go public. I blame the seahag, Laura Miller. I still blame her for the Arlington Cowboys.mickgreen58 said:True. But you gotta admit you are loving this . Also, the Dallas Mourning News had the Parade plans on the front page Monday and now the series is tied. If the Mavs lose, that article alone will be the reason the city has egg on their face.
- Mike G.
Well I do admit to getting a giggle after reading the parade plans and the subsequent articles bashing them.mickgreen58 said:True. But you gotta admit you are loving this . Also, the Dallas Mourning News had the Parade plans on the front page Monday and now the series is tied. If the Mavs lose, that article alone will be the reason the city has egg on their face.
- Mike G.
I don't think he should be suspended, but then I wouldn't be surprised if he was, because the contact was excessive.peplaw06 said:I for one loved that foul by Stack on Shaq. He made Shaq make the free throws. It did look like he was going after the ball, but he couldn't make it through a big guy like that. I really don't think he should get suspended. The two flagrant 2s I've seen these playoffs where someone got suspended (Posey's hit on Heinrich and Bell's hit on Kobe), there was no semblance of going for the ball. Stack's foul was no where near that severe. Shaq just takes a hard fall because he's so big. If Stack gets suspended the same amount as Bell or Posey, that would be ridiculous.
BlueStar22 said:Yeah, someone at city hall leaked it. Someone just had to get their name in the paper. True, plans for a parade have to be made in advance, however, you don't allow that to go public. I blame the seahag, Laura Miller. I still blame her for the Arlington Cowboys.
BlueStar22 said:Stack suspended for Game 5. Avery is on Galloway and Co. now and he is pissed.
WoodysGirl said:I don't think he should be suspended, but then I wouldn't be surprised if he was, because the contact was excessive.
One thing I can speak on for sure, Stack was in no way going for the ball. There was too much body-to-body contact involved to suspect he was going for the ball. On that play, if he was going for the ball, he would've gotten Shaq from behind, because he would've tried to dislodge the ball on his way up. I say this because he would've taken the angle to try and get the ball and he still would've made body contact, but it would've been different. And it would've been a traditional hard foul. He got Shaq from the side, like somebody jacking somebody up on a ST play.
Jason Williams may have made his most influential play of the NBA Finals in Game 4 – albeit unwittingly – when he waited for Shaquille O'Neal to catch up to him, fed him for a possible dunk and then watched as may have made his most influential play of the NBA Finals in Game 4 – albeit unwittingly – when he waited for Shaquille O'Neal to catch up to him, fed him for a possible dunk and then watched as Jerry Stackhouse clocked O'Neal on his way to the rim.
At the time, Miami Heat coach Pat Riley was upset with his point guard, who had a clear path to the hoop for an easy layin. But now that Stackhouse has been suspended for Game 5 by the league for his flagrant foul on Shaq, Riley might want to call Williams and congratulate him. The Heat already had plenty of momentum, but now they have a golden opportunity to take a 3-2 series lead over the Dallas Mavericks.
Stackhouse is Dallas' toughest player, and for a team that was physically manhandled in Thursday's 98-74 defeat, his loss is crucial. He is the Mavs' leading scorer off the bench and a guy who is always in the game at crunch time. In his absence, Marquis Daniels should step in and play some major minutes for Avery Johnson.
As for the NBA's decision to suspend Stackhouse, I don't believe the league made a good decision. Yes, Stackhouse's foul was hard, but he raced back on defense, caught up to O'Neal and fouled him hard to force him to make two free throws. That's what you're supposed to do as a player, particularly in the playoffs. There are no easy baskets, especially when the guy you're fouling is such a poor free-throw shooter.
Was the foul malicious? No. Was it cheap? No. Can you compare it to Raja Bell's clothesline foul of Kobe Bryant that also warranted a one-game suspension? Not a chance.
What about Jason Terry's punch of Michael Finley in the Western Conference semifinals? That was a punch, which is an automatic suspension – no questions asked. Even the suspension of Udonis Haslem for firing his mouthpiece at referee Joey Crawford during the first round made sense because the officials have to be protected. And James Posey's blatant crosscheck of Kirk Hinrich in Game 3 of the Bulls-Heat series warranted at least a one-game suspension, if not two. Posey lined up Hinrich and made a premeditated hit on him while he was dribbling out on the floor, not driving for a layup.
The one controversial play in the playoffs that did not result in a suspension, ironically enough, was when Reggie Evans grabbed Chris Kaman's, uh, nuggets, so to speak, in the Denver-Clippers series. Evans got off with a $10,000 fine. Go figure. All I know is that NBA fans deserve to see the two best teams battle it out for the championship with the best players on the floor.
If Stackhouse punched somebody or pulled a Raja Bell, by all means, he should be sidelined. But to suspend him for a hard foul in the NBA Finals? The league should have fined Stackhouse – say $10K, like Evans – but made a distinction between what he did and the premeditated, dirty plays that Bell and Posey made.
Oh what does Steve Kerr know, he's only got 3 or 4 rings.peplaw06 said:
WoodysGirl said:Oh what does Steve Kerr know, he's only got 3 or 4 rings.
I'm not suggesting he should've been suspended. I think I stated that in one of my other posts. But I'm really not surprised by it.
It was not just a hard foul, it was excessive. Does it compare to the foul-causing-suspensions? Not sure. But I bet it has everything to do w/him not going for the ball. His attempt to go for the ball that you claim came after contact was made and his arms came down.
I've seen the replay several times and his "attempt" to go for the ball was secondary and it was done after he'd already made contact and knocked Shaq off balance. Refs were definitely correct in assessing the Flagrant 1 foul. The league making it a Flagrant 2 is questionable, but understandable.
My comment about Stack possibly going for the ball from behind was based on his ability to take a different angle to catch Shaq and then elevate for the ball. Still would've been a foul, but it would've been clear he was going for the ball, and "maybe" the contact wouldn't have been as much.