ChuckA1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,537
- Reaction score
- 7,542
That doesn't matter with the Participation Trophy crowd.LOL, how many MVP 1st place votes did he get?
That doesn't matter with the Participation Trophy crowd.LOL, how many MVP 1st place votes did he get?
Uh, he asked about SuperBowls, not stats. So you just walked down a road you never should have because with all them stats, where is Dak's Superbowl? lmaoTrent Dilfer had a passer rating of 80.9 with 153 yards and 1 touchdown in 1 game in Super Bowls in Super Bowl XXXV against the Giants on January 28, 2001.
Brad Johnson had a passer rating of 79.9 with 215 yards, 2 touchdowns and 1 interception in 1 game in Super Bowls in his career.
Patrick Mahomes has a passer rating of 85.2 with 1,071 yards, 7 touchdowns and 5 interceptions in 4 games in Super Bowls in his career.
Tom Brady had a passer rating of 86.2 with 145 yards and 1 touchdown in 1 game in Super Bowl XXXVI against the St. Louis Rams on February 3, 2002.
the bottom 2 are all time greats with pedestrian stats in SBs
but i wasnt even talking SB Im talking in general
Dak Prescott has a passer rating of 91.8 with 1,962 yards, 14 touchdowns and 7 interceptions in 7 games in the playoffs in his career.
same place the rest of the teams is. I used it as a comparison for a discussion he was having with me. context is importantUh, he asked about SuperBowls, not stats. So you just walked down a road you never should have because with all them stats, where is Dak's Superbowl? lmao
Well, then come out and say what you think. Don't put other QB's down because they did not have pretty stats but did win a SB and that Dak has better stats but a fat zero. Context is right.same place the rest of the teams is. I used it as a comparison for a discussion he was having with me. context is important
stats are flashy gotcha things to grab on to, you do not have to have great stats to make a positive impact on your team winning. For example Eli gets a lot of hate but he made crucial big time plays in his 2 super bowl winssame place the rest of the teams is. I used it as a comparison for a discussion he was having with me. context is important
You guys the second daks name is brought up just get tunnel vision almost as bad as TDS well nothing is that bad. whether you choose to see it takes a team effort is on you but it remains FACTWell, then come out and say what you think. Don't put other QB's down because they did not have pretty stats but did win a SB and that Dak has better stats but a fat zero. Context is right.
I admitted it was a team game but the QB play weighs heavier on the scale of the chance of winning more than the other positions. outside of a handful of outliersYou guys the second daks name is brought up just get tunnel vision almost as bad as TDS well nothing is that bad. whether you choose to see it takes a team effort is on you but it remains FACT
I agree sir Eli had some Key plays in both runs but you asked to give you an instance where a QB played bad in a SB and they still won. I gave them to you and my initial statement had nothing to do with a SB. That was youre statement.stats are flashy gotcha things to grab on to, you do not have to have great stats to make a positive impact on your team winning. For example Eli gets a lot of hate but he made crucial big time plays in his 2 super bowl wins
they play an important role for sureI admitted it was a team game but the QB play weighs heavier on the scale of the chance of winning more than the other positions. outside of a handful of outliers
That’s not how the voting process works but it’s ok man we will just agree to disagree. I can’t really argue with this or debate if you’re familiar with the process.He received NO 1st place votes, the votes that actually matter. The votes he received were basically like a participation trophy.
I have tunnel vision? Eight years of bad QB play might give me that, huh? Tell me what TDS is?You guys the second daks name is brought up just get tunnel vision almost as bad as TDS well nothing is that bad. whether you choose to see it takes a team effort is on you but it remains FACT
I think his point of bringing up other quarterbacks wasn’t to down them but to show that winning a SB is a team game.Well, then come out and say what you think. Don't put other QB's down because they did not have pretty stats but did win a SB and that Dak has better stats but a fat zero. Context is right.
Dak hasn’t been bad for 8 years. You guys get stuck in this hole and can’t get out and start saying some crazy things.I have tunnel vision? Eight years of bad QB play might give me that, huh? Tell me what TDS is?
not just important, it is crucialthey play an important role for sure
Oh, so you are now speaking for him? Stay out of the convo unless you are asked a question, isn't that what you tell others to do.I think his point of bringing up other quarterbacks wasn’t to down them but to show that winning a SB is a team game.
Naw I tell you to stay out of the conversation if you aren’t paying attention. I’ve kept up with everything and understood his point. You somehow got lost in it.Oh, so you are now speaking for him? Stay out of the convo unless you are asked a question, isn't that what you tell others to do.
We know it is a team game, but you are not winning the big one without your QB playing a crucial role outside of a handful of outliers.I think his point of bringing up other quarterbacks wasn’t to down them but to show that winning a SB is a team game.
thank you he know that though hes just being his honery self when it comes to dakI think his point of bringing up other quarterbacks wasn’t to down them but to show that winning a SB is a team game.
POT meet kettle.I want even talking with you with the postOh, so you are now speaking for him? Stay out of the convo unless you are asked a question, isn't that what you tell others to do.
That is not trueAverage quarterbacks don’t make All Pro. Just doesn’t happen.