Even if Garrett said this, was he really wrong about it? It's obvious Irving had more passion for the green than he did for football. That's fine. To each their own but you can't have both as long as it is illegal to use in the NFL. He chose his path. Let's move on.
Similar thoughts...
As one of probably several gathered here who can speak first-hand about dealing with cannabis addiction and the hazy bubble that cannabis-addicted individuals live inside, when the drug/medicine (whatever you call it, it is what it is) has you in a place of psychological desperation to that degree, it speaks for itself how likely it is that you're going to be able to cognitively function at a high level for an extended period of time (like a whole football season). (And just to be clear, I'm fully aware we're not talking in terms of a biological addiction, but rather a psychological one.)
And it all makes more sense now, in hindsight--what was the ongoing complaint about Irving? Flashes, but not nearly enough consistency.
What we think we know about cannabis use is that it matters if you're using as a teenager and it matters how much you're consuming, and if you're using a lot in those years that your frontal cortex is intensively trying to develop, that's not going to go well.
Seems legitimate to assume Irving used a lot as a teenager.
(I'll avoid the political discussion, except to say, I wish there was a way to 100% ensure that we could keep that from happening with adolescents, and my Spidey-sense says that making access that much more available probably doesn't help.)
I'm sad for the guy, like I'm sad for the very close relative of mine who is 28 going on 18, and still has no clear direction for his life.
Yes, some people are going to make some serious money in that industry. I just don't think that winning the lottery makes for a fulfilled life. There's more to life.