gjkoeppen
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,703
- Reaction score
- 3,327
He is a personal services contracted employee. He represents a League and a Business. His actions, through the personal conduct clause, can be interpreted very liberally, by the NFL. We have already seen this to be the case.
At some point, you have to face this very simple fact. You don't have to like it but the truth is that this is what the CBA spells out and this is what the players agreed to. How many times does this have to be discussed before it is accepted as fact? I just don't understand why this is so hard to understand by players and fans?
Just in case you haven't heard, personal services contracts are not allowed in the NFL. Early on when the cap started teams tried to skate around the cap by signing player to personal service contracts to the owners for more money but the league band them. Contracts today or player service contracts and yes they do have a conduct clause but I argue in this case that an attorney would get any possible suspension from this thrown out because the ONLY injured party here could be the wife and if she arranged this then she's not injured.It's not illegal and if it was then all swingers clubs would have to be shut down. This attorney would get a judge to tell the NFL to keep out of the lawful personal lives of it's players. In other words be a prude on your own time but don't drag others into your prudish ways.
.