Dean Blandino's explanation

[Plumfool]

What's comical is that in week 7 against the Giants, of that same year, Dez had a catch tremendously similar to the Green Bay one and it was ruled a catch by the replay center. Thus How does the Oct 19 2015 catch differ from the Jan 11 2016 catch when the sequence of events are so similar?

Only thing I can think of is Blandino's "enough of a football move" which by its statement is a judgment call and had no business in the final ruling.

 

[KJJ]

What's comical is that in week 7 against the Giants, of that same year, Dez had a catch tremendously similar to the Green Bay one and it was ruled a catch by the replay center. Thus How does the Oct 19 2015 catch differ from the Jan 11 2016 catch when the sequence of events are so similar?

Only thing I can think of is Blandino's "enough of a football move" which by its statement is a judgment call and had no business in the final ruling.

Provide the replay and let's break it down.

 

[Plumfool]

Provide the replay and let's break it down.

Work rn

 

[KJJ]

Work rn

You mentioned it so provide the replay and let's see how tremendously similar it was. Similar doesn't mean identical.

 

[LatinMind]

I just read Dean Blandino's explanation of the penalty on Butler in the Green Bay game. I believe that either he is an incompetent **** or crooked as hell. What an *** clown!!!!! That is all. Carry on.

who cares bout that penalty im more mad at this one. This one literally costed the game

 

[Plumfool]

You mentioned it so provide the replay and let's see how tremendously similar it was. Similar doesn't mean identical.

Stil at work. And you can save your condescension thank you.

 

[KJJ]

Stil at work. And you can save your condescension thank you.

Thought you were wanting me to do it, the burden is on you. I don't even remember the play but I'll guarantee I won't have any problems showing the differences.

 

[pete026]

Stil at work. And you can save your condescension thank you.

C'mon, that is his only significant contribution to CZ!

 

[KJJ]

C'mon, that is his only significant contribution to CZ!

This coming from a guy with a grand total of 7 posts. lol

 

[pete026]

This coming from a guy with a grand total of 7 posts. lol

It doesn't take very long to figure you out.

 

[KJJ]

It doesn't take very long to figure you out.

It hasn't taken very long to figure out you're a banned member who's come back under a different username. You just outed yourself....congrats! Your contributions to CZ got you terminated. lol

 

[pete026]

It hasn't taken very long to figure out you're a banned member who's come back under a different username. You just outed yourself....congrats! Your contributions to CZ got you terminated. lol

You are wrong again. Never been banned.

 

[KJJ]

You are wrong again. Never been banned.

Busted! lol

 

[pete026]

Busted! lol

This coming from a guy who is so full of himself that he dares anyone to find anything he got wrong besides the outcome of the 2014 Cowboys season.

What was your prediction of the outcome of the 2016 Cowboys season if Romo went down?

 

[KJJ]

This coming from a guy who is so full of himself that he dares anyone to find anything he got wrong besides the outcome of the 2014 Cowboys season.

What was your prediction of the outcome of the 2016 Cowboys season if Romo went down?

For a guy who claims they're not a banned member, who's returned and have only been here since Jan 9, you sure seem to know a lot about me and the comments I've made...hmm.. You continue outing yourself with every post. lol

 

[KJJ]

What was your prediction of the outcome of the 2016 Cowboys season if Romo went down?

I predicted the day Romo went down in preseason that if Dak continues to play the way he has and leads the Cowboys to the playoffs, the QB position is his job to lose and Romo will never get it back....bingo!

 

[pete026]

For a guy who claims they're not a banned member, who's returned and have only been here since Jan 9, you sure seem to know a lot about me and the comments I've made...hmm.. You continue outing yourself with every post. lol

Wrong again! For a guy who claims to get nothing wrong, you're swinging and missing a lot.

You also don't have a very good memory because within the past few weeks you dared anyone to find something you got wrong outside of the 2014 season. It took me a whole 2 minutes to find your post saying if
Romo goes down the Cowboys season is over.

And this isn't a case of stalking; you put out the challenge. I just took you up on it. I would never have even mentioned it if not for your present condescending remarks to others.

 

[pete026]

I predicted the day Romo went down in preseason that if Dak continues to play the way he has and leads the Cowboys to the playoffs, the QB position is his job to lose and Romo will never get it back....bingo!

Wrong again. This statement was before Romo got hurt. Give it up!

 

[KJJ]

Wrong again! For a guy who claims to get nothing wrong, you're swinging and missing a lot.

You also don't have a very good memory because within the past few weeks you dared anyone to find something you got wrong outside of the 2014 season. It took me a whole 2 minutes to find your post saying if
Romo goes down the Cowboys season is over.

And this isn't a case of stalking; you put out the challenge. I just took you up on it. I would never have even mentioned it if not for your present condescending remarks to others.

I challenged anyone to find a prediction I was wrong about outside the 2014 season and never got a response. lol I've posted that a number of times since the 2014 season. You sure seem to be keeping an eye on my posts which is pretty strange for someone who's only been here a month. Almost half your post count has involved responding to me. Appears you still have some wounds festering from when you were here under your old username.

 

[pete026]

I challenged anyone to find a prediction I was wrong about outside the 2014 season and never got a response. lol I've posted that a number of times since the 2014 season. You sure seem to be keeping an eye on my posts which is pretty strange for someone who's only been here a month. Almost half your post count has involved responding to me. Appears you still have some wounds festering from when you were here under your old username.

You would be hilarious if it weren't for the fact you're serious. Following you....... you really are full of yourself. You challenged anybody and it took me a couple minutes to prove you wrong. You are really hung up on post counts and old usernames. You do realize that anyone can read threads on CZ without being a member. I've already explained my history as I don't have anything to hide.