btcutter;1970910 said:huh? you play 10 yds off so you don't get burned with safety help but still get you *** handed to you? I don't want a player like that. He maybe a great athlete but if he can't play football I don't want him. If you think he can be developed, then pick him in the 7th round. that's where developmental prospects are picked not 2nd round.
Throw out all those "Jerry Rice only ran a 4.6" comments, because they're meaningless. If he'd trained with today's trainers he might have broken a 4.3.
wayne motley;1971013 said:The DC at VA Tech calls Flowers the best cover CB he's ever had there (includes DHall)...however, Flowers played the boundary side of the field (probably due to his speed or run support/size)...Macho Harris played the wide side of the field for the past two years.
WoodysGirl;1971018 said:^^
This post needs more exclamation points!!!!
ThatsmyQB;1971021 said:Can you explain the boundary side and the wide side of the field, I never heard those terms before.
ThatsmyQB;1971014 said:I don't think it's so cut and dry.
I mean DEION ran how fast how many years ago?
Bob Hayes ran HOW FAST how long ago?
Plus you got guys like Anquan Boldin running a 4.78 and being a STUD W.R. in the NFL!
ThatsmyQB;1971025 said:this post is a waste of everyone's time!
Actually I wasn't so much complimenting him as I was reading it with Screamin Stephen A. Smith's voice in my head. It read very well actually.Bob Sacamano;1971047 said:whoa, calm down newb, she was complimenting you
and only I am allowed to give her guff![]()
ThatsmyQB;1971021 said:Can you explain the boundary side and the wide side of the field, I never heard those terms before.
WoodysGirl;1971056 said:And no, B.S., you're not allowed to give me guff.
I'll have to think about it...Bob Sacamano;1971065 said:not even a smidgen?
I'm glad DRC blew-up cuz the CB I prefer is.....McKelvin. Now maybe the Texans will take DRC and we get McKelvin!theogt;1970763 said:Talib? He'll be there at 22. And I hope we DON'T take him, unless Jenkins, DRC, Cason, and McKelvin are all gone.
WoodysGirl;1971071 said:I'll have to think about it...
uhm, nope.
Of course some guys ran fast in the past. The point is that 40 times as a whole are better now than in the past because of training. None of us know what kind of training Rice had when he came out, but coming out of a small school I doubt he had great training in the 40. You can almost gurantee, however, that guys today received the proper training, so their 40 time is their "true time" in the sense that it's the best time they could put up with the maximum amount of training.ThatsmyQB;1971014 said:I don't think it's so cut and dry.
I mean DEION ran how fast how many years ago?
Bob Hayes ran HOW FAST how long ago?
Of course. The exception might be for guys like DeMarcus Ware or DRC -- small school guys that didn't play against great competition in college such that you could compare his ability well against the other players on the field. In that case, if their numbers match the film, you'd obviously place them higher on your draft board than you would if they had slow Combine numbers.Plus you got guys like Anquan Boldin running a 4.78 and being a STUD W.R. in the NFL!
I think you gotta look at how they perform ON THE FIELD and if you got two or three guys at a position ranked all close to each other, THEN you would use the pseed to put one ahead of the other, but I would be hesitant to plug someone in higher based SOLELY on speed over game film!
40 time for RBs is a useless stat.Remember Emmitt running bad bet on film he rarely ever got caught from behind they said wehn evaluating him, and Boldin like I said, and Irvin ran a 4.6 I believe, and he wasn't slow on the field either.
Agreed.SPEED to me just pushes up a guy if they're closely ranked on film prior to the combine, I'd be weary of moving a guy up who I had as a 3rd round W.R. based on game film because he ran a 4.3 at the combine, cause if he was that fast, then his GAME FILM should of had him ranked higher to begin with, so something is missing.
We all knew guys like McFadden and Justin King and Dexter Jackson were FAST, so just because they ran fast at the combine shouldn't make them move up or down based on where you had them ranked prior to the combine based on game film IMO!
I don't think running with pads really adds much. What makes a guy look faster on the field isn't because he runs faster with pads on, but because his instincts and reaction time make him look faster. You're not going to get that out of just putting pads on them while they run the 40.Also I personally have no idea why they don't make the players run the 40 yard dash and basically every drill just about in FULL PADS!
I mean, some players are FAST without pads and once the pads and extra weight and bulk they don't run as fast where others can run just as fast with pads on or off, my guess is that's what players like Irvin, Rice, Boldin can do, the extra weight and bulk doesn't slow them down, but players like a Dexter Jackson who ran a 4.27 might only run a 4.4.5 with pads on cause his body is smaller and all the extra stuff on slows him down considerably more than a guy like James Hardy who's 6'5 and 220 pounds.
Of course.Bottom line, don't put too much stock in the combine numbers, guys like Mike Mamula happen every year, go by GAME FILM and you'll be a lot better off and only use SPEED and Bench press to move guys who are rated the SAME on game film.