RustyBourneHorse
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 41,649
- Reaction score
- 48,137
What is it that we need?
A 1-tech or a 3-tech that can actually play?
I'd like both. I think having a combination of those would make our defence even better.
What is it that we need?
A 1-tech or a 3-tech that can actually play?
We have blue chip talent up front too. Ours is just outside but it slides protections and draws doubles just the same. Moreso we have a lot of talent along the DL just not the 325 lbs variety.Is Robinson that good, or did he benefit from playing next to Aaron Donald?
He resigned with the Chiefs.Nandi would be a nice pick up
He resigned with the Chiefs.
I now believe it was a bad rumor. Stupid internet!Did he sign or was he just a visit?
But it's hilarious they would consider Robinson when they already have Dexter Lawrence and Leonard Williams. I guess they think DT is important.
I'm not expecting too much more when they either resign Hankins or someone similar. Probably will take another day 3 prospect and don't envision them taking a 3T this year, unless someone falls in their laps.Ooof, well, Hankins and Harris would be nice. Or, I'd love it if we could get Breese from Clemson (3T) and Ika or Mazi Smith in round 2 (NTs). I think that would give us such a powerful interior Dline, and it'd make running on us borderline impossible, which combines nicely with our already deadly pass defence.
The thing about going the route of the draft is they aren’t gonna tale a 1tech very hughHope they are playing it right and can end up with a guy like Ford or Robinson on a cheapish deal (or both) and then can look to the draft to supplement.
I don't care what they claim, their DT situation right now based on who is signed is pathetic for a team that will yell from the mountain tops at anyone who will listen that they are a legit SB contender.
I'm not expecting too much more when they either resign Hankins or someone similar. Probably will take another day 3 prospect and don't envision them taking a 3T this year, unless someone falls in their laps.
I don’t really understand how they rotate that position, especially in nickel situations, to even guess what body type may be most useful, let alone which player/s.I'd like both. I think having a combination of those would make our defence even better.
I don’t really understand how they rotate that position, especially in nickel situations, to even guess what body type may be most useful, let alone which player/s.
What I DO know is that we have invested several day two picks recently, and that hasn’t worked. We have signed lower end free agents. That hasn’t worked. The only remaining option would be higher priced free agents, all of whom appear to be gone.
Every team needs to roll the dice or be weak on paper somewhere. Ours always appears to be right up the gut, and it’s far from a secret to the rest of the league.
It’s also very likely a big reason why we are a night and day team with a lead as opposed to behind.
oof or not./. fans in rush they are notOoof, well, Hankins and Harris would be nice. Or, I'd love it if we could get Breese from Clemson (3T) and Ika or Mazi Smith in round 2 (NTs). I think that would give us such a powerful interior Dline, and it'd make running on us borderline impossible, which combines nicely with our already deadly pass defence.
oof or not./. fans in rush they are not
obviously, they will wait until post draft and then choose from what's left. im betting they might be looking for that round 1-3 true 1t/NT , not there they go FA
So, is that a yes or a no?We have blue chip talent up front too. Ours is just outside but it slides protections and draws doubles just the same. Moreso we have a lot of talent along the DL just not the 325 lbs variety.
Yes, but his injury history scares me a little bit. However, he is a good prospect.I could see that, though, I think if Breese falls to us, he'd be a smart choice.
I do understand the concern about the injury history. However, I do think the risk of that is outweighed by his ability as a 3T. I'd happily take him or Mazi in round 1 and, if we go Breese, Siaki Ika in round 2.Yes, but his injury history scares me a little bit. However, he is a good prospect.
That the thing. If they don’t get a top DT in the draft…meaning someone slid to 26 that shouldn’t have, they are going to have to go with the same strategy that hasn’t worked.I do understand the concern about the injury history. However, I do think the risk of that is outweighed by his ability as a 3T. I'd happily take him or Mazi in round 1 and, if we go Breese, Siaki Ika in round 2.
I would only consider Mazi/Ika the earliest in rd 2 as they offer zero pass rush abilities.I do understand the concern about the injury history. However, I do think the risk of that is outweighed by his ability as a 3T. I'd happily take him or Mazi in round 1 and, if we go Breese, Siaki Ika in round 2.
When I watched his game footage, he looked better than I expect as a pass rusher; However, he was not as strong vs double teams on run plays as I expected.I would only consider Mazi/Ika the earliest in rd 2 as they offer zero pass rush abilities.