SDCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,762
- Reaction score
- 22,729
Plug in Randle
And draft his replacement.
Pretty much. Even Randle has looked pretty good behind this line. There is no reason to break the bank on Murray.
Plug in Randle
And draft his replacement.
I'm with you. Top 10 money is ok. 5 years is even a year too long for me. Otherwise, I have a lot of faith in our rushing-yards-before-contact numbers and look to get a guy or a committee next season with what we've got plus a second or third round pick. The only thing I really worry about is we have nobody other than Randle on the roster who is proficient with the RB's responsibility in pass protection, and that's not a skill you easily replace in one season out of the college ranks. The leading-the-league in rushing stuff I don't actually care as much about. It's fun to see, but I don't mind just being a really good rushing team if we can still field an impressive offense and use the extra cash to address the pass rush or S problems.
Everyone has to remember how fast MB3 dropped off in production.
The beating to the body ages a RB in dog years.
Exactly. Murray does not avoid contact with his style. Within 3 years, he will be a shell of what he is now.
not a chance in hell he takes a 3 yr deal.
Exactly. Murray does not avoid contact with his style. Within 3 years, he will be a shell of what he is now.
You still need to be a pretty good back to start a season like he started, and set the Cowboys single game rushing record (without this line). The problem with him has not been what he can do on the field cause he's played pretty well despite subpar run blocking.
Unfortunately, that's true.I don't see Jerry letting Murray go if he continues like this.
No I always laugh at you. seriously
which is likely but also realize the 3 years in between have real value.
you just have to assess that value and determine its market value.
murray certainly looks like a top 4 RB right now if not even more elite.
while there is most definitely a walking away point that isn't a best case scenario for anyone.
It's been a a while since we had an offensive line that could run block.
If its too expensive, let him go.
If he is going to want adrian peterson money, then it simply is not worth it. If Stephen is going to juggle the books around to be able to keep Dez, Mcclain, and melton, I'd rather let Murray leave go and use that money on a great defensive linemen (suh, or we could get two really good guys in here) and spend a 2nd or 3rd rounder on a good running back out of college.
I dont think Randle is anything special- i do think Dunbar has some special skillls. Pai him with a big back and the running gane wiuld still flourish.
No, no you dont.
Lets just say what many say about Emmitt... if it wasnt for his offensive line...blah blah blah
He takes nowhere close to the beating mb3 took.......
And those types of RBs don't last very long and they tend to get less aggressive after getting paid. See Marion Barber. It would great to keep Murray at a reasonable price but if he wants top 3 money for 5 or 6 years, then I'd be fine with Randle, Williams, Dunbar, and a 2nd-4th round draft pick competing for the right to run behind this top 5 oline.