- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
Here is the video.
Is this really a block in the back?
Wow. They didn’t really show that in the telecast. That was really tricky-tacky. No wonder Garrett was pissed.
Here is the video.
Is this really a block in the back?
No, it wasn't a block in the back. What it looks like to me, is that Wagner let up because he had a teammate coming at him from the other side and he was avoiding the collision with his own guy.Just looked at the replay amazed that Dak got by Wagner. I think it might have been because Jarwin blocked Wagner in the back. What say you?
Go to the 6 minute mark in the video, which shows multiple replays of the play.
Just curious, because it would have been a game changer if they would've called the penalty.
In the infamous words of Schultz, I know nothing, I see nothing!!!!
if that is the case then a Wilscum first down should have been called back for a block in the back on JonesJust looked at the replay amazed that Dak got by Wagner. I think it might have been because Jarwin blocked Wagner in the back. What say you?
Go to the 6 minute mark in the video, which shows multiple replays of the play.
Just curious, because it would have been a game changer if they would've called the penalty.
I think it was a holding call on that play and the block did have some jersey in his hand. It was still a very ticky tack call but it occurred right in front of the ref. could have been devastating if we lost.How about that block in the back they called that took away Tavons punt return?
It looked pretty clear to me that the block was square on the sholder at worse and approaching the chest more than the back.
Here is the video.
Is this really a block in the back?
Nope, not even close. You can't block in the back when you are engaged with a defender, which Jarwin was.Just looked at the replay amazed that Dak got by Wagner. I think it might have been because Jarwin blocked Wagner in the back. What say you?
Go to the 6 minute mark in the video, which shows multiple replays of the play.
Just curious, because it would have been a game changer if they would've called the penalty.
Here is the video.
Is this really a block in the back?
How about that block in the back they called that took away Tavons punt return?
It looked pretty clear to me that the block was square on the sholder at worse and approaching the chest more than the back.
No. Jarwin barely got his hands on him. Bad play by the all world Bobby Wagner who was basically invisible the entire game.Just looked at the replay amazed that Dak got by Wagner. I think it might have been because Jarwin blocked Wagner in the back. What say you?
Go to the 6 minute mark in the video, which shows multiple replays of the play.
Just curious, because it would have been a game changer if they would've called the penalty.
Did you see a hold?It was called a hold, not a block in the back.
Did you see a hold?It was a hold that took away Tavon's punt return.
No. Jarwin barely got his hands on him. Bad play by the all world Bobby Wagner who was basically invisible the entire game.
There was one shot, IIRC, of him with a tiny bit of jersey between his thumb and forefinger. Not nearly enough to affect the defender, and shouldn't have been called.Did you see a hold?
if that is the case then a Wilscum first down should have been called back for a block in the back on Jones
Did you see a hold?