One thing I will say is that, in my opinion, the coaches are doing both Randle and Michael a disservice by forcing this 'by the book' running back by committee nonsense.
It looks to me like they're putting no stock into the players actual performance in determining who's playing, but rather going by some 'script'. As soon as any of them had a quality run, they were headed to the bench.
I'd very much like to hear those who tried to defend this committee approach try to do the same right now.
So how is Leary seeing the field?
Because Leary isn't missing assignments and has shown that he can pass protect.
A lot different from a tailback that doesn't understand his assignments and gets your QB sacked, stripped and injured for the rest of the season.
YR
Randle got run over a few times yesterday, could Cmike be any worse?
Yeah like that McFadden cut block on Collins pass protection?? Awful
Randle got run over a few times yesterday, could Cmike be any worse?
At least McFadden was in the right place to make an awful block. LOL
The script sucks and I totally agree. It is so obvious rather than riding the hot hand. It's actually getting embarrassing,the fans see it, don't you think the teams are figuring this thing out!
Again...not knowing assignments is far worse than getting run over. One is a free shot at a QB going full speed. The other is at least being impeded.
And I'm no Randle fan and would love to see Michael get on the field. But when a guy isn't getting on the field and looks far better running the ball...it's usually a situation where he doesn't know the assignments.
There was a Christine Michael sighting yesterday, but it was another all too brief one. And it got me wondering why? He had a nice carry for 6 yards that looked to provide a spark, but right after, it looked like he turned to our sidelines and made a bit of a mocking gesture, opening his arms wide as if to say 'do you see what I can do?' After that move, I didn't see him in the field again and I can't help but wonder if the decision was related to that move.
Yeah but had that been Romo back there we would have all cringed!
That, or a coaching staff who sticks with the 'devil they know' far longer than they should.
Again...not knowing assignments is far worse than getting run over. One is a free shot at a QB going full speed. The other is at least being impeded.
And I'm no Randle fan and would love to see Michael get on the field. But when a guy isn't getting on the field and looks far better running the ball...it's usually a situation where he doesn't know the assignments.
YR
No. JG said in his press conference they had planned to mix him in more but we got too far behind and we went into our two minute offense.
I guess I'm just having a hard time buying that he doesn't know his assignments by now. Same as I'm finding it hard the O line suddenly forgot theirs.
No. JG said in his press conference they had planned to mix him in more but we got too far behind and we went into our two minute offense.
That, or a coaching staff who sticks with the 'devil they know' far longer than they should.
It's not just about knowing assignments, it's about knowing when to stay in to block and knowing when to release. That's what got Romo injured in 2010...Chris Gronkowski released for a pass when he needed to stay in and block. The play called for Gronkowski to release, but he completely timed it wrong and Romo got crushed and was out for the rest of the season. Many RB's never get it and that's why they may be great runners, but never find their way in the league because they can't be trusted in pass protection.
The O-Line has been great in pass protection all year outside of the Patriots game. And in reality, it was only Leary that stunk in pass protection against the Patriots. Weeden, Randle and McFadden didn't do the O-Line any favors yesterday. But at least Randle and McFadden got beat instead of poorly diagnosing the play.
YR