DaBoys4Life
Benched
- Messages
- 15,626
- Reaction score
- 0
this is kind of like mcnabb not knowing the game could end in a tie.
Nope, that's what I'm thinking. And personally, I could care less about Romo. I'd like to see them sit him for a game or 2 like Fat Andy did to McNabb.Coakleys Dad;2996262 said:this has to be a joke.
Coakleys Dad;2996262 said:this has to be a joke.
Everlastingxxx;2995949 said:OMG...
Unreal.
dcfanatic;2996391 said:[youtube]C2vBfWIcxhw[/youtube]
--------------------------
Just more ammo for his haters.
sm0kie13;2996542 said:would be interested to see what the refs did when he motioned at them?
Hoofbite;2996144 said:Its not a matter of effort. Its a matter of not knowing what was going on.
If you think you have an extra down, going to Sam Hurd 2 times in a row isn't nearly as dumb as going to Sam Hurd 2 times in a row without an extra down.
So yes, it does matter. It matters because if he knew it was 4th down he probably wouldn't have gone to Hurd again. At least I hope not.
Everlastingxxx;2996554 said:You kindof see the ref smile. The camera man was just on espn radio (that shot the video) says the refs had a chuckle after he motioned to them that it was 3rd down.
AdamJT13;2996574 said:There's no excuse not to know what down it is, especially in that situation. But at least that would explain why he didn't wait for an open receiver on the last play. If he knew it was fourth down, maybe he would have, instead of throwing toward a well-covered slant.
Don Corleone;2996586 said:Situational football? Our team doesn't know anything about that.
AdamJT13;2996603 said:Do you remember the fourth-down pass we converted earlier in the drive? Romo didn't just drop back and quickly throw to a well-covered receiver, he kept the play alive as long as possible and waited for someone to come open, because he knew that was our last chance.
What I'm saying is that, supposing he didn't know what down it was at the end when he threw to Hurd for the second time, perhaps if he had known it was fourth down, he would have treated it like the previous fourth-down play and kept it alive until someone actually got open.
In other words, if he did not know it was fourth down, it's not a bad thing only because he wasn't aware of the down when he absolutely should be, it's also a bad thing because it likely affected his decision-making on the play.
AdamJT13;2996603 said:Do you remember the fourth-down pass we converted earlier in the drive? Romo didn't just drop back and quickly throw to a well-covered receiver, he kept the play alive as long as possible and waited for someone to come open, because he knew that was our last chance.
What I'm saying is that, supposing he didn't know what down it was at the end when he threw to Hurd for the second time, perhaps if he had known it was fourth down, he would have treated it like the previous fourth-down play and kept it alive until someone actually got open.
In other words, if he did not know it was fourth down, it's not a bad thing only because he wasn't aware of the down when he absolutely should be, it's also a bad thing because it likely affected his decision-making on the play.
AdamJT13;2996574 said:If he didn't know that it was fourth down, he probably was signaling that the previous play was third down, not that the next play was going to be third down.
There's no excuse not to know what down it is, especially in that situation. But at least that would explain why he didn't wait for an open receiver on the last play. If he knew it was fourth down, maybe he would have, instead of throwing toward a well-covered slant.
It'll be interesting to hear what he says when asked about the play -- assuming that anyone bothers to ask him.
In thinking about the last few plays I thought he was extremely quick with the 3rd down play to Hurd. That play started with :09 on the clock. Kind of like he was trying to get 3 plays off in 9 seconds if need be.AdamJT13;2996603 said:Do you remember the fourth-down pass we converted earlier in the drive? Romo didn't just drop back and quickly throw to a well-covered receiver, he kept the play alive as long as possible and waited for someone to come open, because he knew that was our last chance.
What I'm saying is that, supposing he didn't know what down it was at the end when he threw to Hurd for the second time, perhaps if he had known it was fourth down, he would have treated it like the previous fourth-down play and kept it alive until someone actually got open.
In other words, if he did not know it was fourth down, it's not a bad thing only because he wasn't aware of the down when he absolutely should be, it's also a bad thing because it likely affected his decision-making on the play.
theebs;2996615 said:Assuming anyone asks him? Are you serious.
Espn radio and the fan cant get enough of this today. they love it when stuff like this happens. They are going to rub it in his face for the rest of his career.
This will be all we hear about for weeks.
Marty b told bob sturm that he didnt know anything about it. At least the ticket has class and actually discusses it like adults, the other stations it is just this big giggle fest. They love it.
this might be all he is asked about.