Can someone please answer this question as i'm interested in the answer?
I would imagine that a QB hoping to earn $35-$40 million a year would have at least a reasonable record against teams with a winning record to justify such contract demands...
Every thread you post in you turn it into a hate Dak thread. You proud of that?
Vikings calling time outs because they're going to score 3 times in 90 seconds.
Can someone please answer this question as i'm interested in the answer?
I would imagine that a QB hoping to earn $35-$40 million a year would have at least a reasonable record against teams with a winning record to justify such contract demands...
Well it's leading the team back because...they actually led the team back to win a few games when behind!
Jimmy G had an excellent game against the Saints and carried the team to victory, Cousins had an excellent games when heavily trailing against the Broncos - Prescott didn't have a game like that this season. That's the difference, a quarterback actually being the main reason why the team won a game.
Prescott did not have any of those games for the Cowboys this season. If we had Andy Dalton we would have still won the same 8 games this season. That's the whole point - Prescott's stats are completely meaningless and a strong indication that they were in garbage time as...they didn't help us score a bunch of points in loads of games or even have a winning record.
Bless you for your logic and reasoning. Need more posters like thisDoes Dak play every position on the field? Does he play defense? Special teams? Does he coach? Set the gameplan?
There are literally 21 other players on the field that determine wins or losses, and nothing is predicated solely on the QB.
Also, I'd like to point out that 'record against winning teams' has become the new 'Dak can't throw it deep'.
You don't like the QB and look for any demonstrable proof that justifies an irrational hate. And when you can't find any proof, you default to 'eye test'.
First it was intelligence. Proven wrong. Then inaccuracy. Proven wrong. Then it was he can't throw it over the middle. Proven wrong. Then it was he can't throw it deep. Proven wrong. Now it's record against winning teams.
What's next? Dak is a terrible QB because he can't throw it deep with one leg being held by Danielle HUnter in a snow storm?
Were the Rams 8-8?Pretty sure it was 1-6...beating only the Iggles.
Must be nice to have an organization that actually cares about winning first
He's overrated to me but to get him for a 2nd round pick was a nice come up. No brainer move. Allowed for them to address their needs in other rounds as opposed to drafting a quarterback in the 1st round.Jimmy G was a great trade for SF. They had a solid defense and needed a QB.
AmariChill, do you realize that Cousins, nor Garapolo; are on bad teams? Do you realize that better teams, usually have better records? Do you realize, how foolish, some your comments are concerning Dak? Where were Dak's trash stats his first three years?
Indy Colts and Minny Vikings are two spots were Dak would be an upgrade and where I would like to see him land!