Based on the following language?Givincer;2622413 said:May be a stupid guess, but does anyone think the one thing they couldn't agree on was Owens being on the team?
No, not at all.I'm sure this was something you wanted to do right? "Oh yeah, no question about it. I really and truly thought the deal was done. And after several days of discussing it and so forth we basically came to an agreement and so I thought it was done but with some of the concessions that Jerry had made he ended up putting some things in there that I wasn't comfortable with that he thought was important to him and just felt like if we couldn't come to an agreement it's best we part if we both weren't' going to feel comfortable with the thing."
Hostile;2622364 said:Wade has officially been castrated. Might as well pull the plug and ask Shanahan to fix this thing.
Idgit;2622419 said:We're overreacting to Reeves leaving, since we don't have any idea what the holdup was. There's more in the works and we don't have the data yet. But Reeves leaving doesn't mean Jerry's done trying.
I think the chances that he does something more drastic--like replacing the head coach--have gone up. We're not going to sit tight just because of a term in a contract for a consultant we wanted to work with couldn't get ironed out.
theogt;2622416 said:Based on the following language?
No, not at all.
Dude, that's quite a leap.Idgit;2622419 said:We're overreacting to Reeves leaving, since we don't have any idea what the holdup was. There's more in the works and we don't have the data yet. But Reeves leaving doesn't mean Jerry's done trying.
I think the chances that he does something more drastic--like replacing the head coach--have gone up. We're not going to sit tight just because of a term in a contract for a consultant we wanted to work with couldn't get ironed out.
Most people will believe what they want to believe.Givincer;2622421 said:Doesn't seem too terribly implausible to me, even given what he said.
Idgit;2622419 said:We're overreacting to Reeves leaving, since we don't have any idea what the holdup was. There's more in the works and we don't have the data yet. But Reeves leaving doesn't mean Jerry's done trying.
I think the chances that he does something more drastic--like replacing the head coach--have gone up. We're not going to sit tight just because of a term in a contract for a consultant we wanted to work with couldn't get ironed out.
theogt;2622422 said:Most people will believe what they want to believe.
Ozzu;2622426 said:Frankly, it's embarrassing. You give the guy a freaking office and act like it's a done deal and then you can't figure out a way to officially define his role in his contract? And that's that?
Ozzu;2622426 said:I didn't get the hire to begin with really. It sounded to me like we had a coaching staff that was incompetent and they were going to hire someone to try and fix it instead of just hiring a competent coaching staff, but whatever. At least it was a change and one that could potentially be for the better.
Then they handle it like this?
Frankly, it's embarrassing. You give the guy a freaking office and act like it's a done deal and then you can't figure out a way to officially define his role in his contract? And that's that?
theogt;2622422 said:Dude, that's quite a leap.
Most people will believe what they want to believe.
chinch;2622427 said:Overreacting?
:laugh2:
Cupcake is not getting fired now. Jerry's ego's PET PROJECT techmo-bowl is gonna be groomed some more to perhaps be able to run an offense. Jerry will save that $6m and double-down on TO (paying his roster bonus whenever) bringing the circus back soon enough.
iRoot4Losers;2622306 said:just confirmed what everyone was thinking
Jerry ****ed it up
Ozzu;2622426 said:I didn't get the hire to begin with really. It sounded to me like we had a coaching staff that was incompetent and they were going to hire someone to try and fix it instead of just hiring a competent coaching staff, but whatever. At least it was a change and one that could potentially be for the better.
Then they handle it like this?
Frankly, it's embarrassing. You give the guy a freaking office and act like it's a done deal and then you can't figure out a way to officially define his role in his contract? And that's that?
FuzzyLumpkins;2622449 said:What was it that Jerry was asking for? Oh wait you don't know.
iRoot4Losers;2622461 said:everything was in place until the last minute, Jerry brought something up, and Reeves quits
whatever it is, it doesn't sound favorable on Jerry
FuzzyLumpkins;2622463 said:If I ask you to be polite and you say no and walk out of the room then who should look bad? You have no idea what was asked or anything.
iRoot4Losers;2622466 said:but we do know Reeves was set to go as a consultant in some capacity, until Jerry walks into the room, and Reeves up and quits
use your head man
Reeves even said himself that it was a stipulation in his contract that he didn't agree with that made him quit
Idgit;2622469 said:Without knowing the stipulation, how is it you're determining it was unreasonable to ask for it? Or reasonable to insist it not be there?
If the situation were reversed, and it was Reeves who wanted the unknown stipulation, and Jerry not comfortable with it, is there any chance you'd be blaming the situation falling apart on Reeves?