I hate how there is absolutely no point in projecting prospects this early...
And yet, here I am.
The site also has the Cowboys taking Florida cornerback Teez Tabor, who had been suspended twice by the school during his career. His second suspension was for "behavior that [was] not acceptable," according to the team's head coach.
He didn't seem too broken up about the second suspension.
He addressed his behavior before the most recent college season.
"I'm me," Tabor said, according to ESPN. "I'm going to be honest. What you see is what you get. Sometimes [it gets me in trouble]. If you ain't being you ... if you ain't living for nothing, you'll die for anything. That's how I see it."
not going to go out and spend big in free agenc
"Right away" sounds like draft for need.
Yep. Pair him with Tapper on the right side. Tappers run defense is currently ahead of his pass rush and Harris pass rush is ahead of his run defense. Here is to hoping he makes it to 28.Maranelli would love this guy, he plays hard and loves football. He would make an immediate impact in my opinion.
That's the type of mindset that turns into a year's worth of busted draft picks. They don't need to change their draft approach in any way. They're finally starting hit on picks and going with the "need" angle is a recipe for failure.They need to go defense no matter who it is.
Yep and a recipe for "meh" over the next few years."Right away" sounds like draft for need.
We all would love a draft full of defensive talent that could turn our defense top tier after a season or 2 but its not looking that promising that the options will be their.That's the type of mindset that turns into a year's worth of busted draft picks. They don't need to change their draft approach in any way. They're finally starting hit on picks and going with the "need" angle is a recipe for failure.
Agreed. I said basically the same thing in a thread earlier today. If I'm sitting at 28 and a TE ranked #15 overall falls to you and you take the DE ranked as the 35th best player in the draft, you're an idiot and deserve your roster woes 3 years down the road.We all would love a draft full of defensive talent that could turn our defense top tier after a season or 2 but its not looking that promising that the options will be their.
That's the type of mindset that turns into a year's worth of busted draft picks. They don't need to change their draft approach in any way. They're finally starting hit on picks and going with the "need" angle is a recipe for failure.
Doubt need or position value will really interfere with the draft board. The fact that we took Zeke at 4th overall proves that.I agree, but it's hard to believe need won't intersect with value in this draft considering how deep at dline and cb it is. I am sure if a guy like Ross falls they would consider though.
Absolutely you should measure need with value. But we MUST stay close to our value board regardless of our "needs".I agree, but it's hard to believe need won't intersect with value in this draft considering how deep at dline and cb it is. I am sure if a guy like Ross falls they would consider though.
If Leary leaves and we move Collins to RT like we should, I'd take the G.People waste too much time on the BPA versus need argument. Dallas, like a lot of teams, blend it. And often their boards are built with some need in mind.
If Dallas is sitting there at 28 and the 20th ranked guy on their board is an OG and the 23rd ranked guy is a CB and the gap isn't wide between the two, they'd probably take the CB.
If Leary leaves and we move Collins to RT like we should, I'd take the G.