Zimmy Lives
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,165
- Reaction score
- 4,631
If Hardy had signed with the Patriots or Giants he would have his own Reality Show by now.
It almost feels like he already has a reality show!
If Hardy had signed with the Patriots or Giants he would have his own Reality Show by now.
The idea that this is a media creation is bizarre. Jones and the front office see Hardy every single day, up close. They know who and what he is better than any media member, so why the hell would they make decisions based on what the media says?
They very well may extend him. No one really knows. But it's pretty obvious now that if Hardy continues to have some sideline issues, misses or is late for meetings, or has some other issues, it's unlikely he's coming back. Jones' statement two days ago pretty much made that clear.
For the same reason they made the decision based on what the media coverage was on TO.
As the Cowboys official said when TO was released, they really didn't have a problem with TO or his behavior. But, regardless of what TO did, it brought too much negative attention which turned into a distraction.
For instance, Mr. Blue Suit claimed that TO was crying on the sidelines after the win against the Bengals in which TO caught the game winning TD because 'he didn't get the ball enough.' It was later to be found that TO was crying because a close family friend that helped raise him had passed away earlier that week and he dedicated the game to him.
That's what caused TO to refuse to answer any of Mr. Blue Suit's questions as he would continually say 'next question' every time Mr. Blue Suit posed a question to him. It became something that clearly embarrassed and angered Mr. Blue Suit as the other reporters would laugh at him every time TO would say 'next question' to him.
That's when Mr. Blue Suit concocted the suspect story of TO complaining about Romo going to Witten. As bad as people may hate TO, it was never verified and as the Cowboys official said...they had NO problem with his behavior. It was because a doofus like Mr. Blue Suit would do whatever he could to make any story he could about TO.
So if they are afraid that TO was too big of a distraction even though they had no problem with his actual behavior...what makes me think that they will not treat Greg Hardy the same way?
On October 25th, the Giants played the Cowboys and Hardy had that heated argument with Bisaccia. Despite that, Jones said after the game that Hardy was a 'leader' on the team and they were hoping to extend his contract. This caused more scrutiny from the media. The scrutiny later intensified when the DA expunged Hardy's record (y'know, basically the DA saying that he didn't do the crime he was convicted of), the media responded by posting the photos of Nicole Holder on November 6th.
And that's when Jerry started to calm down on the extension talk when the media started to go to no ends to convict Hardy in the court of public opinion.
We simply don't know if the missed meetings are excused or not. Hardy has likely had rehab for the injuries he suffered in the Seattle game and may have some type of deal in his contract where he has to go for psychiatric help or whatever.
Why is it that we hear about a Dallas Cowboys player missing a meeting or showing up late to a meeting? Do you mean to tell me that there are no other players across the league that ever miss a meeting?
It seems to me that Jerry may be bowing to the pressure of public opinion just like he did TO and I would rather have him and Rich Dalrymple do their job and contain this nonsense and allow them to field the best team that they can field.
YR
Laufenberg: Think Greg Hardy's a problem now? Consider this scenario
![]()
Dallas Cowboys defensive end Greg Hardy (76) on the bench before a game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa on Sunday, November 15, 2015. Tampa Bay Buccaneers defeated the Dallas Cowboys 10-6. (Vernon Bryant/The Dallas Morning News)
Babe Laufenberg, Dallas Cowboys radio color analyst and former NFL quarterback, answered questions about the team in a chat Wednesday. Here are some highlights.
Question: Mincey says Hardy-DeMarco Lawrence spat no big deal. But Hardy seems to argue with teammates all the time? Is that really no big deal?
Babe Laufenberg: I think in that instance, it truly was no big deal. Problem is, it comes on the heels of the game day confrontation with the special teams coach in NY and missing meetings. But yeah, this one a minor blip on the radar screen if taken as an isolated incident.
Question: Babe, I think it is a given that Greg Hardy won't be a Cowboy next season. With that being said, the Cowboys can save $5 million this season if they cut him before Sunday's game with the Dolphins. So let me ask you, do they roll the dice with him the rest of the season to try and make a late push or do they cut bait now?
Babe Laufenberg: Ha! They rolled the dice with Hardy the minute they signed him. Don't see that happening, as this team is still hoping to make a playoff push, as improbable as that sounds when they are sitting here at 2-7. But here is the bottom line, this is a player who knows that all eyes are on him, who is hoping to get a long-term contract, yet there has been a nearly weekly proclamation of, "We addressed it with Greg and are moving forward." So if you are going by the assumption (and I am) that he is "on his best behavior" what happens when he has real job security?
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FULL CHAT
This has been there since he was signed.Except it's not.
Jones stated two days ago that Hardy has to meet some expectations the team has put in place in order for the Cowboys to even extend him.
A month ago, the team was at 2-3 and Hardy just dominated the Pats offensive line.A month ago he was signing a more aggressive tune about bringing Hardy back.
Well, I think they are media creations. First it was domestic abuser Hardy saying "crass" comments about the beauty of Brady's wife, a woman who essentially gets paid millions of dollars to help sell a product by exposing the beauty of her body. Then it was the 'angry and uncontrollable' (a description in line with domestic abuser) Hardy getting into it with a coach even though he was clearly frustrated that the special teams choked against the Giants. Then it was disrespectful and not a good teammate Hardy arriving late for work once and missing a few meetings as a result. Also, on game day, it seems like the commentators show no qualms about further emphasizing these things if he shows any emotions on the field.Again, none of this means Hardy is gone for sure or definitely coming back. But I think people are burying their heads in the sand over this trying to convince themselves that Hardy's issues really aren't a big deal and just a media frenzy. Jones doesn't say what he said on Tuesday if in fact the Cowboys weren't growing a bit tired of the Hardy show at this point. If things were great and just media creations, I doubt he says what he said.
Note none of this is a defense of the media. They absolutely have a target on Hardy's back. But I suspect when Jones says what he said on Tuesday, it wasn't because believed what the media was throwing out there but rather what he and his front office have seen up close from Hardy.
Would anyone here have signed hardy before the season? Be honesty
"jobberone, post: 6420192, member: 375"]Question: Babe, I think it is a given that Greg Hardy won't be a Cowboy next season. With that being said, the Cowboys can save $5 million this season if they cut him before Sunday's game with the Dolphins. So let me ask you, do they roll the dice with him the rest of the season to try and make a late push or do they cut bait now?
From what I recall, Seattle was one team that was interested but were worried about the possible price tag (not b/c of what happened to him).
Seattle is a team that drafted Frank Clark, so...
He'll turn into just a really good player eventually like he was before with Carolina and all of this other stuff will die out.
Greg Hardy is the only elite player we have on the defense. The media's vendetta with him is their own problem and it should be ignored by the FO. They should let this season play out and only then evaluate if they want to retain his services on a long term deal. There are ways to structure that deal that would keep him at his best behavior despite the fears that mediots like Laufenberg tries to perpetuate.
lol LOL!
His eliteness half been on full display the last 2 gamez, man. holla!
Other than the fact they have come out and said they want to give him long term deal since day one, I suppose your right.