erod
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 40,636
- Reaction score
- 64,040
You didn’t address my question . Lol
Your thinking we’re going to start running Dak?
I was originally responding to a post that suggested we run a RPO offense.
You didn’t address my question . Lol
Your thinking we’re going to start running Dak?
If, by chance, the do cut Dez, they have already proven that they don't plan to fully replace him with a rookie.Let's say that Dallas cuts Dez and is hoping to replace him with a draft pick. Let's take a look at the first round receivers from the past several years and let me know if any of these guys excites you?
2017:
7. Mike Williams.
9. John Ross
2016:
15. Corey Coleman
21. Will Fuller
22. Josh Docton
23. Laquon Treadwell
2015:
4. Amari Cooper
14. Devante Parker
20. Nelson Agholor
26. Breshad Perryman
29. Phillip Dorsett
I really think that taking a receiver at 19 would be a horrible idea. I know that it was posted in other threads the % of routes that Dez ran last year. 29% was a 9 route. Coincidentally, he ran a comeback at 3%, really!!?? 3%? That is a great compliment route if you are constantly running the 9 Route. If Dez stays, and I hope he does, let's hope that this new Dak friendly offense is also Dez friendly too.
You don't sign Thompson as a free agent and then cut him without giving him a year. FO would look like idiots.
Nonsense, it happens literally every year on multiple teams.
Nonsense, it happens literally every year on multiple teams.
If, by chance, the do cut Dez, they have already proven that they don't plan to fully replace him with a rookie.
They already added Hurns and Thomas. A rookie would just be in addition to that.
Having said that, I'd prefer to wait until > Rd1 to take a WR
Thompson is Brice, he has speed but his hands are 50/50 at best.I suspect we add rookie and cut dez
Thompson and brown probly competing for last spot. Thompson brings speed element we lack, but the team seemed to like brown and his run blocking and physicality. Not sure if keeping 7 is a possibility.
I don't think they are.I think that is a colossal mistake to assume that either one of those guys would be our number #1 WR. I know that is not what you are saying, but that would be awful if they are thinking that way.
I’d rather cut Dak and take one of these QB’s in 1st round. Although I’d like to keep Dak for a backup.If they cut Dez you can bet WR will be the pick at 19.
So the one who should be targeted is Linehan and Beasley...or really just Linehan...Linehan's offense and Beasley being doubled on 3rd down hurt Dak. Other team's defenses figured out how to stop Dak without
Zeke.
So they can keep doing anything they want... duh.Save money for what?
So the one who should be targeted is Linehan and Beasley...or really just Linehan...
Yet here all these folks are allowing JG, Linehan and company to blame Dez to save their own butts, and you are carrying there pail for them.
Just say no to day 1-2 wideouts. The bust rate is HUGE. Would much rather wait and take Callaway or Fountain
Nice try.. but read the threads on this board and you will see how much venom is spewed at Dez and how much at the coaches.This kind of comment is way off base to me, and way too often used. It treats the Dak situation as if it is all about finding a scapegoat, and has nothing to do with Dez's contract.
Hell, we don't even know that Dez is going to be cut - but why wait to b1tch at the team, because if he doesn't get cut we will have missed the chance!
It's ridiculous some fans don't seem to understand there are business reasons that factor into these kinds of things as well. OF course, I don't think some fans care to understand. Some prefer to think there is a little conspiracy within the Cowboys coaching staff to find a scapegoat.
