Do we still target Donald? Or do we go S in round one?

TwentyOne

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,816
Reaction score
4,451
Or offensive live, defensive end, free safety, Linebacker.?

We locked up Melton so Donald isn't a need.

Melton has essentially a one year deal. Even if he plays lights out the following three years are expensive. But it could be that his knee forces him to take plays off who knows.
Donald is a great player so why not take him ? He is not such a big need anymore but would be a great addition to a DL that lives from rotating guys. In 2015 if Donald pans out we could have the option to cut ties with Melton. Would be smart business.

But a 3-Tech is now no first priority to me anymore.

I'd love to pick us: RT/G > DL > Safety > WR > LB.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
Without a doubt, you still draft Donald if he is there and he is the best player on your board.


The Melton contract is a 1, possibly 2 year deal. You need more then just one quick, disruptive DT in Marinelli's scheme. Absolutely you take him if he's the best player on the board at your pick. The value of the Melton signing is that it allows you flexibility if he's already gone or if another player, ranked higher on your board, is there at our pick. Or, knowing Jerry, if he somehow figures out a way to trade up for Johnny Football (which I hope he is smart enough not to do).
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,624
Reaction score
23,110
Carter's issue is instincts.

4-3 LBs don't engage and shed OL anymore, that stopped happening about 20 years ago. You will lose everytime if you engage a lineman, they're simply too big, strong and athletic in today's NFL. Name of the game is being able to slip blocks.

Call it what you want. No matter how you slice it, we are talking about the ability to not be blocked by offensive linemen. Call it slipping. Call it shedding. Call it avoiding. 43 linebackers still need the ability to do it, no matter how slippery they are. Shazier has shown me nothing to make me believe he is anything more than an athletic specimen. I question his instincts and ability to be any better than Carter due his reliance on athleticism.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,464
Reaction score
67,275
If your going bpa why pass. Claiborne had done nothing to think long term and carr might be gone after this year.

First of all, Gilbert is a top ten player. Easily. If he drops to our spot, then I have him on a street corner in a short skirt. This is a CB crazed league and I am certain he would fetch a nice haul. You know, like we gave up for Claiborne.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,576
Reaction score
12,282
If your going bpa why pass. Claiborne had done nothing to think long term and carr might be gone after this year.

People misunderstand BPA . You might see very little separation in ratings of several players. That one is listed as say your #12 and another your #14 doesn't mean much if they have similar ratings from your scouts. 12 might be a smidge higher in the ratings but unless it is a substantial difference you have to see those guys as about the same. At that point you ask who is likely to improve the team the most. So it is never just best player. It is a combination of player and fit.
 

AmishCowboy

if you ain't first, you're last
Messages
5,134
Reaction score
569
I think now unless it's Martin, I think we trade down if we can find a partner
 

pacboyX

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
772
CB isn't a need now but that could change really fast. What happens if Mo keeps getting hurt and Carr keeps getting burned? If CB is BPA, I would except it.

We also need a 3rd guy that can play outside and inside. I don't think we should spend our 1st round pick on one but if thats BPA then I'm all for it.

Maybe if we can for once, grab a safety that can cover we wont see our CBs getting burned. How can our CBs play aggressive when we have C+ safeties if that. Wilcox will be better than Church, maybe even this year. We need a coverage guy that can tackle, not safety that tackles great but cant cover a TE for ishh.
 

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,433
Reaction score
6,841
Whoever gets Donald, it will be interesting to see how he does in the pros. I remember when they were trying to replace Haley and Shante Carver had lots of sacks in college but when he got here didn't do much at all. Rod seems to be pretty good at knowing what he wants on the d line but I wonder how good he is at evaluating individual players. Last year he just took a shotgun approach until someone stuck. It will probably depend on how good the evaluation is by our scouting dept.
 

supercowboy8

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,110
Reaction score
485
First of all, Gilbert is a top ten player. Easily. If he drops to our spot, then I have him on a street corner in a short skirt. This is a CB crazed league and I am certain he would fetch a nice haul. You know, like we gave up for Claiborne.

Ok but I said if he is there I would take him. You wouldn't? You just said he is top 10.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
7,688
You think he can play 43 DE? I'm still trying to figure it out. Looks alot more like a natural OLB in a 34. I've watched some of his game film. Not to good vs the run and not overly impressive vs the pass this year either .

I think he can. He's obviously raw, having only played OLB for 2 years, but I think he can make an impact on day 1 as part time player, similar to Aldon Smith in 2011. Give him some time to learn how to play DE and I think he could be great.

But I won't be holding my breath waiting for him to fall to us.
 

Nomad

Active Member
Messages
476
Reaction score
89
Still go DL, but you obviously have more flexibility. I would do best defensive player .

And I would take OL in the later rounds.
 

Next Years Champ

Active Member
Messages
515
Reaction score
185
Or offensive live, defensive end, free safety, Linebacker.?

We locked up Melton so Donald isn't a need.

This now is not a need this season.

Not as far as having to go DL as a #1 pick.

That really opens up to exploring trades and maneuvers to pursue the best trading partners.

Somebody is going to drop to us at 16 some team will covet..

I hope.
 

ChooChoo73

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
603
Highest ranked trenches player. Martin, Donald, Jernigan. Grab him and throw him into the mix. Lather rinse repeat for round 2. As for safety, why on earth? We have to find out what we have in the two we played at free safety last year. Since we had no pass rush, how do we know how good they are? Seattle, SF, GB, Denver, NE, Cinc, Carolina, KC aren't any better than we are at safety and they do fine. However, they are mostly light years ahead of us on defensive and/or offensive line.
 

Manwiththeplan

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
7,688
People misunderstand BPA . You might see very little separation in ratings of several players. That one is listed as say your #12 and another your #14 doesn't mean much if they have similar ratings from your scouts. 12 might be a smidge higher in the ratings but unless it is a substantial difference you have to see those guys as about the same. At that point you ask who is likely to improve the team the most. So it is never just best player. It is a combination of player and fit.

No, best player available is simply the best player available with out need in mind. If what you're trying to say is no one goes BPA to the letter, then I would agree, but for everyone that clamors going best player available regardless of need, shouldn't get mad if we draft a CB who is the best player available.
 

VThokie7

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,065
Reaction score
506
Highest ranked trenches player. Martin, Donald, Jernigan. Grab him and throw him into the mix. Lather rinse repeat for round 2. As for safety, why on earth? We have to find out what we have in the two we played at free safety last year. Since we had no pass rush, how do we know how good they are? Seattle, SF, GB, Denver, NE, Cinc, Carolina, KC aren't any better than we are at safety and they do fine. However, they are mostly light years ahead of us on defensive and/or offensive line.

Kam Chancellor and Earl Thomas say hello. Pretty certain the best safety tandem in the league is worlds better than our crew.
 

thunderpimp91

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,234
Reaction score
15,758
I've never been the greatest at projecting college players, but to me it comes down to Donald, Ealy, or Clinton-Dix. If all three are gone by #16 then I would attempt to trade down. If for some odd reason all three are available I wouldn't not take Donald just because of the Melton signing. Both Donald and Melton are flexible enough that you could line them up all over the D line. You also could play some 5 man fronts with both of them lined up over the guards. You still have to find a pass rushing DE later on in the draft but if you did Donald in the 1st could make this Dline not only improved over last season but possibly a strength. Ealy would probably be my second pick as he gives you a much needed outside rush threat. I do worry that he will be weak against the run and not an every down player early on in his career.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,391
Reaction score
17,215
With the Bears losing both Peppers and Melton, it would be surprising if Donald fell past Chicago.
 
Top