CZ POLL Do you want Dak back with the latest reported contract offer?

[America's Cowboy]

Philly last season? We would've been in the playoffs. Against any teams with winning records basically.

Dak was playing injured. Remember???

 

[MRV52]

NO go get Brady and sign him to two years. Dak is not a top tier QB.

 

[Diehardblues]

I'm not applauding, just clarifying the facts and pointing out that the poster wasn't being fair or realistic. The point I was making is that It's not fair to hold a QB solely responsible for a team's record, but if you are going to insist on doing so anyway, at least be fair as to what the record is.

I hear ya .
Just saw you recognizing him for averaging 10 wins a season while discounting the QB shouldn’t get all the blame for losses which I’d agree. But it appeared you were attempting to play both sides of it.

Can’t give him credit for wins in one hand but no blame for losses in the other.

If Dak gets credit for13-3 he also should receive his due blame for 8-8.

 

[kskboys]

I voted no, but this is a very tough question, and I don't feel it's a yes or no type of answer.

 

[darthseinfeld]

Since it's the off-season and we cannot seem to reach the Dak Prescott thread limit, I thought it would be fun to get a general summary of what everyone thinks.

As usual, I do not provide an "easy way out" option that most people would quickly choose such as "I want him back just not at that rate" because that's irrelevant and not realistic.

Let's just assume most fans would want him back for a low amount ..

So, the next question is, do you want Dak back at the rumored amount offered?

Yes, because its probably a longer contract than he wants. A longer contract means we have him locked in longer with old CBA/TV contract money. Which would make it a very team friendly contract.

Dak's issue has always been length of the contract

 

[CouchCoach]

I voted no, but this is a very tough question, and I don't feel it's a yes or no type of answer.

It is like removing the QB position form the team.

 

[Captain-Crash]

hell no, the greedy ******* and his agent want to be tagged because next year they can try to scam them out of more money.
"let's pay him 45 million, he has to make more than Wentz"

 

[cern]

Tag him and try to trade him. It's getting ridiculous. Dak's demands will affect our draft and free agency strategy. And not for the better.

 

[JoeKing]

@Reality, let people change their vote until the deadline to tag gets here. It's on the 12th not the 10th.

 

[Big_D]

Why turn down 105 guaranteed? Seems nuts. I think it's time to move on. I don't dislike Dak, but these numbers being thrown around and turned down are just ridiculous.

 

[Reality]

@Reality, let people change their vote until the deadline to tag gets here. It's on the 12th not the 10th.

*laughs*

Polls are not very good or valid if you allow votes to be changed afterwards.

When you allow people to change their votes, people who vote early will change their votes to which ever option is leading the poll later on to be with the majority.

 

[JoeKing]

*laughs*

Polls are not very good or valid if you allow votes to be changed afterwards.

When you allow people to change their votes, people who vote early will change their votes to which ever option is leading the poll later on to be with the majority.

*laughs*

Sticky threads of important NFL dates are not vary good or valid if the dates are wrong.

The event on 10 March was moved to March 12th.

 

[Reality]

*laughs*

Sticky threads of important NFL dates are not vary good or valid if the dates are wrong.

The event on 10 March was moved to March 12th.

This is the wrong thread to post that in ..

In any case, I knew the first extended end date (12th) was temporary and would change (and it has) to a more permanent date, so I left it until a more accurate date was given which is now March 16th.

Now, it has been confirmed, I have updated the sticky thread.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

Absolutely!

Pay Dak his $35 million/$110+ guaranteed. He's earned it. Plus, he's our best option by far.

If the Cowboys refuse to pay him now, Dak is going to cost soooooo much more by season's end (2020) after Coach McCarthy helps Dak perform even better under his pro-QB system.

Pay now or suffer the consequences later. Take your pick Cowboys.

Yes, Dorthy, there is a Santa Clause.....

 

[CWR]

*laughs*

Polls are not very good or valid if you allow votes to be changed afterwards.

When you allow people to change their votes, people who vote early will change their votes to which ever option is leading the poll later on to be with the majority.

Damn it, you just hacked my strategy. You're really putting me out on a limb.

 

[Redball Express]

Absolutely!

Pay Dak his $35 million/$110+ guaranteed. He's earned it. Plus, he's our best option by far.

If the Cowboys refuse to pay him now, Dak is going to cost soooooo much more by season's end (2020) after Coach McCarthy helps Dak perform even better under his pro-QB system.

Pay now or suffer the consequences later. Take your pick Cowboys.

So if he improves so much under McCarthy..

why would we have to pay more to keep him?

Would he not just stay put and try to win with what is working?

This is where I do not trust Dak.

If what he wants is to win as a Cowbou..

having players around him is pretty important.

But if it's just he wants to be the highest paid regardless of wins and titles being won..

get rid of him now.

 

[America's Cowboy]

So if he improves so much under McCarthy..

why would we have to pay more to keep him?

Would he not just stay put and try to win with what is working?

This is where I do not trust Dak.

If what he wants is to win as a Cowbou..

having players around him is pretty important.

But if it's just he wants to be the highest paid regardless of wins and titles being won..

get rid of him now.

Yep, just like we got rid of Romo.




...oh, wait.

 

[buybuydandavis]

Absolutely!

Pay Dak his $35 million/$110+ guaranteed. He's earned it. Plus, he's our best option by far.

That's about the floor now. It only goes up for the rest of the offseason. I won't be surprised if Dak is holding out for a lot higher and plans on playing on the tag this year.

 

[superonyx]

Yeah, because 8-8 quarterbacks are hard to come by.

8-8? Is this thread about Drew Brees? Didn't he go 8-8 or worse in 4 out of 5 seasons?

Or is only Dak being judged by the teams effort?

 

[leeblair]

8-8? Is this thread about Drew Brees? Didn't he go 8-8 or worse in 4 out of 5 seasons?

Or is only Dak being judged by the teams effort?

Dak is being judged by what we've seen; the erratic throws, the lack of leadership, the casual way in which he approaches drives that end in failure, and the poor performances against tougher teams.
He just doesn't have the "it" factor that drives great quarterbacks.
He is the same Dak he was in college. Exactly the same.