QuincyCarterEra
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,332
- Reaction score
- 10,737
Why is there not a "I have no ****** clue" option?
we chased him because jerry wanted to chase him...Jerry made personnel decision for garrett with/without his recommendation.....MM hasn't endorsed ET...let the coaches choose their ingredients and hold them responsible. shoving a player down MM's throat is only going to create conflict ala parcells.....BTW.....Just a reminder, we chased Earl for over 15 months, even offering the Seahawks a 2nd round pick. They refused to trade or release him. Forcing him to the final year of his deal which he missed almost the entire season with an injury. As a free agent, he was determined to be the highest-paid NFL safety WITH OR WITHOUT the Cowboys, which led to his contract with the Ravens. The lesson of the post.....he chose $$$$ over signing with his favorite team. Greed can be tricky..
https://www.star-telegram.com/sports/nfl/dallas-cowboys/article227568624.html
Read the first post that I made so it would simply be a subjective yes or no without the contract being a major factor.For me not as simple as yes or no. I would like to have Thomas but it would have to be within Cowboys salary cap structure. If he wants top dollar then go somewhere else, if he wants to finish his career as a Cowboy then it needs to be in a cap friendly deal. Pretty much take it or leave it
we chased him because jerry wanted to chase him...Jerry made personnel decision for garrett with/without his recommendation.....MM hasn't endorsed ET...let the coaches choose their ingredients and hold them responsible. shoving a player down MM's throat is only going to create conflict ala parcells.....
That option is chosen by not voting.Why is there not a "I have no ****** clue" option?
If other teams are hesitant to sign him which in turn brings the price down and the Cowboys get him for a decent price with some stipulations in the contract...sure.
Bottom line with most players and teams when there are issues with players...is the player worth the hassle and money .
If they are a declining player or they don't want to deal with the player issues than it is not worth it to a team...See TO. When TO was still a great player, teams were willing to put up with it. When he started to decline they were not.
I would say ET is still a good player...so now it comes down to money and security. Are they secure that he will be a good player without serious issues and get a good return on investment....if so sign him, if not do not.
Thomas seems to be the name everyone has heard and thinks of the thomas from 5 years ago. he is on the wrong side of 30, coming off injuries. to say he has lost a step is an under statement. and now seemingly he has lost his focus and drive and just seemingly wanting to have one last large contract.....he is not focused on football, given he has missed meetings apparently to get his car washed, has gotten into fights with teammates and just got cut by the ravens, a superbowl contending team. we are a young team, we don't need distractions given even if he is better than thompson, he may not be much better at this point in his career. Plus, it seems that nobody really wants to sign him, everyone who has a need just like us has said, no thanks...including SF, Atlanta, NO.....
but hey, people on this board like to play madden football, they just make a trade on the game and turn up the ratings and fantasize.
If other teams are hesitant to sign him which in turn brings the price down and the Cowboys get him for a decent price with some stipulations in the contract...sure.
Bottom line with most players and teams when there are issues with players...is the player worth the hassle and money .
If they are a declining player or they don't want to deal with the player issues than it is not worth it to a team...See TO. When TO was still a great player, teams were willing to put up with it. When he started to decline they were not.
I would say ET is still a good player...so now it comes down to money and security. Are they secure that he will be a good player without serious issues and get a good return on investment....if so sign him, if not do not.
We need a safety...
Seems most folks in favor of signing ET are perceiving him as the same guy he was 5 years ago rather than the guy that just got himself fired by the Ravens. It's a nice fantasy but in reality, he is no longer that guy.
I agree in terms of the Ravens, however, I believe him being cut had everything to do with his attitude, actions outside of performance on the field. Still gives me pause but I do believe he would still be a significant upgrade to what the Boys have now.Ravens are one of the few teams in the NFL, where I trust their player evaluations. If they let him go, then I have to believe he's done. I don't see them releasing talent at the Safety position.
Ravens are one of the few teams in the NFL, where I trust their player evaluations. If they let him go, then I have to believe he's done. I don't see them releasing talent at the Safety position.