streetcredit
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,219
- Reaction score
- 1,522
A fumble on the QB is typically due to receivers running the wrong route
keep fighting harder, not buying what you are selling, too many if factors that go into how game is played differently or what could possibly happen after the INt or no TO at all. Sorry cant go back and what if it..i say the early TOs in the first qtr or even first half have far ells effect then the late game one you have zero time to overcome.I had an entire thread on Stephen Gilmore Colts INT being on Michael Gallup . The Hendershot INT against Tenn same not QB fault . Zero points . The turnovers have got to be limited post season no matter who’s at fault .
keep fighting harder, not buying what you are selling, too many if factors that go into how game is played differently or what could possibly happen after the INt or no TO at all. Sorry cant go back and what if it..i say the early TOs in the first qtr or even first half have far ells effect then the late game one you have zero time to overcome.
especially, if said offense or qb go out and play dang near perfectly the rest of the game and light up the defense the rest of the way, with say Rush at qb all of those are magnified not much room for error, with a qb and team who now has hit their stride, can go out and score 40 anyway and win , well that why that indicator is huge variant.. they have some effect but how much one will never know lie i said games are a play by play venture and any one thing that changes make many things change after.,.
really how about Bradys 3 INTs inthe NFCe game did they lose? how abiort stafirds 2 SB picks?? those are the one o remember but im sire other example. Sure play cleaner game.Turnovers = zero points no denying that fact no matter how much you spin it . Lose the turnover Ratio in the playoffs and that will be the seasons last game .
really how about Bradys 3 INTs inthe NFCe game did they lose? how abiort stafirds 2 SB picks?? those are the one o remember but im sire other example. Sure play cleaner game.
says you
sorry too many variables to go back and say well if,...nope..games are ;payed won or lost and you move on..
what i remember from many Playoff games without research is OUR DEFENSE was huge part of our losses, questionable coaching, Penalties were a large part of oiur losses, don't remember many games where Daks name comes to mind where he blew the game, played poorly when other around him did their jobs..
so back to the offense, 14 penalties 11 by the OL, yup that lost the 9er game was #1 on why we lost by 6..play calling, no run support #2 and #3 oh wit Daks not god didn't overcome mistakes. don't remember TOS deciding that game.
rams 18 game very similar to last year's game.
2016 the offense played great; the defense choked. same in 14 same team same choke job by the defense.
defense down the stretch once again these seasons were the reason for much of our struggles and those OT losses..ironic Dak carries them last the bears even with a 246 yards rushing and allowing the bears to nearly make comeback in that first half, same packer game up 14 late , 17 point lead in jags game.. a lot more than those TOs factored into those losses, bad defense comes to mind.. easy quick cpores come to mind, cant stop the rush comes to mind, cant get toff field on 3rd down we can go on and on...
moral, bring a team , team needs to play well , play together have each other's back if and when mistakes are made, or we will be an easy out.. so far this season the D carried the team the first half, O carried the 2nd half and ST has been steady, play calls inconsistent, so i hope they all show up and play together.. eli led the sb season with TOS yet that didn't show up in the playoffs.
No losing battles in a virtual sports forum, that all in your mind, its opinion, hyperbole, and debate.,You keep fighting a losing battle . One example of Brady and that means it’s no big problem turning the ball over in the playoffs losing the turnover ratio . No convincing you . Next tread .
No losing battles in a virtual sports forum, that all in your mind, its opinion, hyperbole, and debate.,
not asking for them saying they can be overcome if they are earlier in games with far less impact.. that was the entire point of the thread TITLE..you lost your way, i did not.I know let’s have those turnovers so the season can start over in July .
not asking for them saying they can be overcome if they are earlier in games with far less impact.. that was the entire point of the thread TITLE..you lost your way, i did not.
It's interesting that the Cowboys lead the entire league in turnover differential.It’s a FACT . Teams that win the TURNOVER ratio WIN 70 % of its games . It doesn’t say anything about 1st 2nd or 4th quarter turnovers .
Whoa, whoa, whoa! Take it easy, bro. That was a "mega" DUH!You’re a 62 year old man telling me “duh”….let’s reevaluate ourselves here….
Unfortunately, cleverness is a gift, and not something one can be taught, so if censorship hampers one's ability to express himself, perhaps he needs to expand his vocabulary.The censorship has greatly limited our ability to express ourselves.
Not a criticism. Just a fact. I mean, if someone calls you a poop head,
for example, it's unfair to laugh. No, you must be upset and prepared
to fight til death, as it was meant to be... lol
Not if you still get to the Super Bowl.“Fellas, is it a bad thing if we lose games early in the season but also win a few games later???” —TheMarathonContinues
5. You don't have a lead, but play well enough to get and maintain one after the interception, which I think is the crux of the OP.The only times an int doesn’t hurt you are as follows:
1. You have such a large lead it doesn’t really matter because the game is essentially clinched.
2. The end of a half or end of a game on a Hail Mary attempt.
3. 3rd and long where you will be punting it if you don’t get the 3rd anyway and the ball is thrown so far that the Int acts as a punt anyway field position wise.
4. 4th down and the int isn’t returned past the original line of scrimmage.
I've never heard that one before.A fumble on the QB is typically due to receivers running the wrong route