Dak hits guys in stride. Dak is more accurate. Dak reads the field just fine. All of this has been proven, again and again and again. He scored 37 TDs, 68.8% and led the number one offense LAST YEAR.
These are the same silly criticisms people lobbed against Dak when he started as a rookie, and led us to the playoffs and won rookie of the year. Then he disproved them, year after year. And then the narrative changed. Oh, he is accurate, but he'll be figured out before too long (disproven). Oh, he hasn't been figured out but he can't beat good teams (disproven). Oh, he can beat good teams but he can't win in the playoffs, he can't get over 200 yds (all disproven). How many other moving targets has Dak been able to hit? Now we're back at square one again, and the same flaws that people have unfairly criticized Dak for since day one (despite all evidence proving the contrary) are the same flaws that Rush actually has. Misses open players? Check. Can't make all the throws? Check. Throws behind guys, over them, under them? Check. Small sample size of success against bad teams? Check. Makes questionable throws? Check.
I get it. We've won three in a row and Rush has been a huge part of that. He's playing within the system, making good decisions (for the most part), and absolutely has command of the offense. He is a fantastic backup QB in our system, and there is nothing wrong with that. Him succeeding does not all of a sudden negate everything Dak has done and can still do. Just because he is good at certain things doesn't mean that Dak isn't also good, or better, at those things.
I am also frustrated with Dak, going back to last year's Denver game. I am worried he is declining due to injuries. His pocket presence, in particular, is cause for concern. But those are legit concerns. You don't need to literally bend reality to criticise his play. Not do you need to prop up a journeyman backup to